I should go with saying, I judge THCV based on landrace Thai, one of the genes I mentioned working with earlier. So I think I am probably biased there... But it interests me as well, because on one hand it opens the door to new possibilities and developments/studies of THC as a whole and as isolated molecules, but it also worries me (like I mentioned prior) that it's going to be TOO common of an issue to run into (Short duration, lack of full cannabinoid "spectrum" etc), and it's a direct relation to the breeding out of traits purposely (The Phenohunting Hype storming Instagram), and that somewhere down the line I'm going to have to do the same Geno/Pheno selection processes JUST TO GET NATURALLY OCCURRING, ESTABLISHED LANDRACE genetics BACK, to restore the all the traits and genetic structures that "My Generation" demanded be bred out. I would much rather spend the large amounts of money and my life on proper equipment/location/education just to preserve the genetic stock of True genetics and the old hybrids that started all these strains (as well as preserving vegetable and fruit gene stock, because smoking won't do us a whole lot of good in the future if we're starving), than spending the equivalent time/money working these strains in reverse to try and get the genes back as best as possible, just because people had to follow a hype/trend.
That's me though. I apologize for the long rant