Government claims it owns children, threatens 2nd mom with jail

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Gold Lion: "I know daughter that you're 12 years old, but you have to get this vaccination".
Gold Lion Daughter: "But dad, I don't want it and it's my right to say no".
Gold Lion: "Ok sweaty, you don't have to have that vaccination if you don't want to".

Weeks later...

Gold Lion: "What! No daughter you may not fuck that 40 year old man, I don't care if you think he's cute or not!"
Gold Lion Daughter: "But dad, I want his fat black cock in my mouth and it's my right to say yes!"
Gold Lion: "Ok sweaty, you can fuck that nice looking black man, but you sit on his face real good, ya hear me!"

Not that there is anything wrong with a 12 year old fucking a 40 year old... amirite @Rob Roy ?
Why is the daughter so sweaty. Has she been running from Rob Roy?
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
* sweetie (ahem)






This is a good example of a fallacious platitude. If a government is "the people" as some allege, Which of those individual people has any right to forcibly dictate what another will do with their body? None.

So, if none of those people have any right to dictate to other people, how does the sum of all those people who don't possess a right somehow create anything but a zero ? Your platitude implies an impossibility. Fail.


You are beyond obtuse.
 

gold lion

Well-Known Member
aww my posts getting deleted? wanted to just point out how weak your argument is when you have to resort to weird pedo-y shit. can't handle the truth?

as stated, you're why people don't stick around on this board, beyond fucked up that riu is cool with this as their image. apparently if you post enough, you own the place. all yours!
 

ChefKimbo

Well-Known Member
Where does it say "Government claims it owns children"? If the gov't has not asserted an ownership claim, you are being disingenuous. Child endangerment, protection of public health, etc are all in legitimate gov't purview. Indeed, gov't oversteps it's bounds at times but not in this case. I was born in 1950 and grew up seeing kids fucked up from polio and other diseases. Oddly, the only polio victims I've seen in 50 yrs have been roughly my age.
Government does not have to assert an ownership claim, ownership is established at birth. At the signing of the live birth record the parents are given fiduciary responsibilities(custodial) in exchange for the LEGAL TITLE(DEED) of the newborn child. The child is then granted EQUITABLE TITLE in the form of social services.This is standard practice and in all cases the parents are pressumed to be aware of the contractual nature of the live birth record. This is why children can be taken without legal remedy due to aquiescence of ownership to the government.
 
Top