Trump/Russia v. Clinton/DNC

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Bad News, by former CBS News Senior Correspondent Tom Fenton

Mass media has an agenda, too.
Click to expand...
Your kind says that Cenk's 20 million dollar fundraising from Kratzenberg' investment into The Young Turks is "just business" and "won't affect reporting or bias" or influence Justice Democrats. .

You cite a former reporter who obviously has a strong point of view as the final word that "mass media" has an agenda and therefore is suspect.

You fail to differentiate opinion pieces from objective reporting. The Young Turks is entirely opinion pieces in the form of video. 100%. Of course opinion pieces in New York Times and The Washington Post are opinionated. That's why they are called opinion pieces. As evidence that you don't understand, I point out that you very often and quite laughingly cite opinion pieces to back up your foolish claims. Of course, this only shows your opinion and bias, not "mass media agenda".

Objective reporting is different. An objective reporting of a news story will contain interviews from sources with different perspectives and provide the facts behind the story for context. The objective news story leaves it to the reader make up their mind. Your claim of agenda is false in this case.

"mass media" is another idiotic idea of yours, as if these are monolithic entities that can be lumped together.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Yup. They took money back from state campaigns and used it on hers.

All of my gay friends are cooler than you.

I wonder how long it will be before you need another sock?
Click to expand...
LOL

You are still hung up on the fake "rigged" conspiracy theory. The guy who ran stormfront started out like you too, eventually he realized he was a nazi. Fake conspiracy theories are excuses not reasons for why things are the way they are.

Referred to but never explained by BTty:

"all my gay friends"

"mass media"

"Establishment Democrats"​

You failed at critical thinking.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Yup. They took money back from state campaigns and used it on hers.

All of my gay friends are cooler than you.

I wonder how long it will be before you need another sock?
Click to expand...
Lol!

The party had nothing and she raised all the funds, why can't you just stop lying?

Hillary won both votes and lost the EC which historically gives Republicans the win in situations where they can lose the popular vote but still win.

But have never done so for a Democrat.

She was so 2016, it's a year and she still owns all that space up in your head.

 
travisw

travisw

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE="Padawanbater2, post: 13928944, member: 232653"
Sanders is the most popular politician in the country. He's the frontrunner on the Dem ticket in 2020 for multiple mainstream news organizations..

[/QUOTE]

Hillary Clinton won that very same poll with a score of 55%. Bernie currently has a 52%. Maybe it doesn't mean as much as you guys think.
Clinton Is Best Known, Best Liked Potential 2016 Candidate
http://news.gallup.com/poll/173402/clinton-best-known-best-liked-potential-2016-candidate.aspx



 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
travisw said:
[QUOTE="Padawanbater2, post: 13928944, member: 232653"
Sanders is the most popular politician in the country. He's the frontrunner on the Dem ticket in 2020 for multiple mainstream news organizations..



Hillary Clinton won that very same poll with a score of 55%. Bernie currently has a 52%. Maybe it doesn't mean as much as you guys think.
Clinton Is Best Known, Best Liked Potential 2016 Candidate
http://news.gallup.com/poll/173402/clinton-best-known-best-liked-potential-2016-candidate.aspx
Click to expand...
The difference is that Bernie has the support of the people, rather than the banksters.

I respect your desire to see someone you can believe in to run the country. Respect my desire to see the same, even if it isn't your first choice.

First things first; we must get rid of the Nazis in office now.
 
Last edited:
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Of course I do; democracy by the people, not the money.
Click to expand...
ttystikk said:
The difference is that Bernie has the support of the people, rather than the banksters.

I respect your desire to see someone you can believe in to run the country. Respect my desire to see the same, even if it isn't your first choice.

First things first; we must get rid of the Nazis in office now.
Click to expand...
You mean like how every single Democrat voted again the Tax Reform Bill that would massively enrich their wealthiest donors?
 
travisw

travisw

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
The difference is that Bernie has the support of the people, rather than the banksters.

I respect your desire to see someone you can believe in to run the country. Respect my desire to see the same, even if it isn't your first choice.

First things first; we must get rid of the Nazis in office now.
Click to expand...
I've never said who I supported for the presidency. I don't think anyone ever asked me. It doesn't bother me who you folks support, I take umbrage with your decision to spend the last year trying to argue the election your candidate lost. Why not talk up what your candidate is currently doing, like his support for Chuy Garcia, rather than trying to argue Obama was actually a republican, Uranium one, or whatever republican talking point is the flavor of the moment. It only serves to deepen a schism we should be trying to repair.

Padawanbater2 said:
Click to expand...
Kid, you are fucking delusional if you don't think, I knew that date of the article I posted. It's the same fucking poll, conducted by the same fucking people. The only difference is she had higher numbers than Sanders, and still didn't fucking win.

By all means though, appoint yourself the victor of a debate no one is having. If I can add some meaning, to your sad feckless fucking life, I'm happy to help
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top