Pigheaded post.
He signed up to a low pay, long hour job and the benefit was part of the contract. Not denying that. It's worth pointing out that when convenient, Republicans are all for breaking those contracts in other industries and "Tump2020" voted for Republicans.
He's speaking out of both ends when he votes to deny benefits to others but proclaims that denying vets is political suicide.
When the shithead calls himself a "veteran" hes making an emotional appeal filled with images of battlefield glory. Surely you don't deny he's a paper tiger and using the word as if he'd seen combat?
I don't know why you are defending him. He's a fucking Republican.
Oh, right. You hate Democrats, not Republicans. Carry on then defend the paper tiger veteran who callously votes against benefits for others when his are safe.
You've got me all wrong- not a surprise, since you have been working hard to put me in a box of your own description for months now, if not years.
His status as a veteran isn't the problem. Not are the benefits he's entitled to as a veteran, no matter what he did it didn't do while in uniform. If he got anything better than a dishonorable discharge, he gets all the benefits he is entitled to. The notion that he shouldn't is a far more right wing position than anything I've ever advanced- but we all know you are very directionally challenged when it comes to political leanings.
His desire to deny others benefits that he's entitled to IS the problem. I happen to agree this is a disingenuous stance and you're right to question it.
Conflation will get you nowhere in this argument.
Attempting to discredit me by misrepresenting my political positions won't, either.
cofveve/screen
