Functional illiteracy in America

PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Maybe he has beaten Moore (who is not my hero).
But @ a 1% difference, I'll wait for the official total instead of relying on the news media.
Hasn't recent history taught you that yet?
Click to expand...
You were literally just mocking the women accusing Moore of rape/harassment/pedophilia in the post I just quoted, as if it were some calculated political maneuver by Democrats. Now that he loses he's "not your hero" but you'd like to still believe that he will win somehow? This is how low of human beings, how much of a blatant disregard of any concept of objective morality, how little ability to discern truth or debate fairly to find truth, that is displayed by people on the right.
 
Last edited:
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
You were literally just mocking the women accusing more of rape/harassment/pedophilia in the post I just quoted, as if it were some calculated political maneuver by Democrats. Now that he loses he's "not your hero" but you'd like to still believe that he will win somehow? This is how low of human beings, how much of a blatant disregard of any concept of objective morality, how little ability to discern truth or debate fairly to find truth, that is displayed by people on the right.
Click to expand...
Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations. ;)
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations. ;)
Click to expand...
I'm still glad he lost. Even leaving his alleged pedophilia aside, his positions were repugnant and regressive.
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations. ;)
Click to expand...
Not slander, you simply discredit them right away and write it off as "those damn Democrats scheming." That is accusing the victims. Why are you quick to assume they are lying but not Moore? In sexual harassment, attempted rape, and rape cases, hard evidence usually is impossible to acquire, but is not required for the average person to discern truth if they examine the known facts. 10 women all with detailed accounts that outline the same sociopath.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations. ;)
Click to expand...
"Baseless claim", it's clear you don't know how supporting evidence works.

When Person A says, "he touched my breast", and a witness, lets call them Person B, says, "yea, I remember seeing that", then a third person comes forward, we can call them Person C, says, "ya know what, I do recall that guy touching Person A's breast as well". Person A's claim is no longer baseless.

And your tiny penis is super small and showing.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
Click to expand...
if 10 accusers went to court with 30 contemporaneous witnesses, multiple yearbooks, cops who were assigned to keep him away from high schools, mall managers who banned him from the mall, and moore's own admission that he had to "ask permission from the mother", then he would lose that case in a heartbeat.

are you really this fucking stupid?

your serial pedophile nazi buddy lost. get over it.
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
Giving UB kudos for smacking the shit out of you in such a humorous way means all of that? You have elevated UB as your bugaboo, dumdum.
Click to expand...
Strange that I see it exactly opposite, but definitely amusing.

You and your cohorts elevated him to such placement which means you all naturally gravitate to 2nd banana @ best.
Use whatever measurement you like (post count, longevity, general stupidity, etc.), it still means you are a sycophantic minion. ;)
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
Not slander, you simply discredit them right away and write it off as "those damn Democrats scheming." That is accusing the victims. Why are you quick to assume they are lying but not Moore? In sexual harassment, attempted rape, and rape cases, hard evidence usually is impossible to acquire, but is not required for the average person to discern truth if they examine the known facts. 10 women all with detailed accounts that outline the same sociopath.
Click to expand...
Because they brought forth allegations w/ no proof outside of a yearbook inscription as proof of something that happened 40 years ago that no one is allowed to examine and verify.
I didn't discredit them. They did themselves until they have something verifiable.
 
A.K.A. Overgrowem

A.K.A. Overgrowem

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
You were literally just mocking the women accusing Moore of rape/harassment/pedophilia in the post I just quoted, as if it were some calculated political maneuver by Democrats. Now that he loses he's "not your hero" but you'd like to still believe that he will win somehow? This is how low of human beings, how much of a blatant disregard of any concept of objective morality, how little ability to discern truth or debate fairly to find truth, that is displayed by people on the right.
Click to expand...
Choomer has hope, several late reporting graveyard precincts could sweep Moore in. Bama is listed as the 4th most corrupt state. I rate them at least second. No one there would challenge the vote of a Civil War veteran.
 
A.K.A. Overgrowem

A.K.A. Overgrowem

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Because they brought forth allegations w/ no proof outside of a yearbook inscription as proof of something that happened 40 years ago that no one is allowed to examine and verify.
I didn't discredit them. They did themselves until they have something verifiable.
Click to expand...
Lame stream reports its been confirmed. It's his John Hancock
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
A.K.A. Overgrowem said:
Lame stream reports its been confirmed. It's his John Hancock
Click to expand...
Great! Link to the report as I'm not interested in doing your homework.
"Lame stream" challenges the Mississippi river in breadth and depth these days which is why I have better things to do than search for the veracity of what you post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top