Functional illiteracy in America

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
So getting money from an ATM that you don't have deposited isn't theft?
Do tell.

I've proved to you using your own "schooling" materials that you are mistaken. Why don't you post some supporting documentation for your claim? Or are you too "super intelligent" for that?

Your mistake was to bring your opinion and present it as undisputed fact and not having anything to back it up.

Then go troll through the Federal Reserve Act and quote the definitive parts of that saying so.
Let me show you how.....again:

These assets are generally Treasury securities which have been purchased by the Federal Reserve through its Federal Open Market Committee in a process called debt monetizing. This monetized debt can increase the money supply, either with the issuance of new Federal Reserve Notes or with the creation of debt money (deposits). This increase in the monetary base leads to a larger increase in the money supply through fractional-reserve banking as deposits are lent and re-deposited where they form the basis of further loans.

This is from the Federal Reserve Act. that you linked to. Why are Treasury Securities purchased by the Federal Reserve if it a Gov't institution without shareholders?

Or just you're bored because you can't back up those claims. ;)
Click to expand...
are you still in the habit of calling small jewish children "kikes", chomoer?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
And yet you're the homophobe and I'm your intellectual superior.

Try much much harder next time. You're out of your league here.

Explain to me again why you think its a good idea that students should be allowed to bankruptcy away a debt they agreed to pay.

Or better yet, explain how a debt can be paid with a debt.

Or or, no, even better idea, explain to me how a Federal Reserve Note is a debt.
Click to expand...
Try explaining why you aren't a complete waste of my time.

Or don't bother, I won't be checking anyway.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
You project an amazing amount of stuff on to me.

And it is an inappropriate and incorrect metaphor.

I have no power to affect what is happening right now from our president. When the time comes I will do what I feel is right.

What I am on the fence about is agreeing with the one sided elitist republican sounding opinions you Democrats here keep forcing on everyone.

You are a bit more reasonable sounding. Until you have more trump meltdown. Hate is a shaky motivator.
Click to expand...
The metaphor is inappropriate because you say so?

LOL

grandiose.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
It’s appropriate because you want to use it?

You are labeling yourself.
Click to expand...
Are you actually going to say that using "Nazi" to lump together Trump supporters, some of whom who call themselves white supremacists, neo-Nazis and alt right and all endorse policies and regulations that are literally killing Hispanic people is an inappropriate metaphor? Would you prefer analogy?

Dude, you are telling us all about how you are neutral about Nazis when your own family was affected by them.

Your complaint? "That's inappropriate". Daaaamn, white man. You have chosen to side with Nazis.

Isolating and killing Hispanic people is inappropriate and there is no neutral ground between supporting or opposing Nazis.
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Are you actually going to say that using "Nazi" to lump together Trump supporters, some of whom who call themselves white supremacists, neo-Nazis and alt right and all endorse policies and regulations that are literally killing Hispanic people is an inappropriate metaphor? Would you prefer analogy?

Dude, you are telling us all about how you are neutral about Nazis when your own family was affected by them.

Your complaint? "That's inappropriate". Daaaamn, white man. You have chosen to side with Nazis.

Isolating and killing Hispanic people is inappropriate and there is no neutral ground between supporting or opposing Nazis.
Click to expand...

You said it. “Some of whom”

But you want to label anyone and anything you want any way you decide. You know nothing about what I have chosen. And your present conviction is absurd. And insulting.

But you think that is a tool that will somehow make me agree with you.

Or face the labeling and name calling.

You are posing both the questions and the answers for me. Without ever learning how I really feel about any of it.

But that is all that can be expected here if you don’t blindly agree with a small group of people who post regularly.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
You said it. “Some of whom”

But you want to label anyone and anything you want any way you decide. You know nothing about what I have chosen. And your present conviction is absurd. And insulting.

But you think that is a tool that will somehow make me agree with you.

Or face the labeling and name calling.

You are posing both the questions and the answers for me. Without ever learning how I really feel about any of it.

But that is all that can be expected here if you don’t blindly agree with a small group of people who post regularly.
Click to expand...
shut the fuck up already
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
So getting money from an ATM that you don't have deposited isn't theft?
Do tell.

I've proved to you using your own "schooling" materials that you are mistaken. Why don't you post some supporting documentation for your claim? Or are you too "super intelligent" for that?

Your mistake was to bring your opinion and present it as undisputed fact and not having anything to back it up.

Then go troll through the Federal Reserve Act and quote the definitive parts of that saying so.
Let me show you how.....again:

These assets are generally Treasury securities which have been purchased by the Federal Reserve through its Federal Open Market Committee in a process called debt monetizing. This monetized debt can increase the money supply, either with the issuance of new Federal Reserve Notes or with the creation of debt money (deposits). This increase in the monetary base leads to a larger increase in the money supply through fractional-reserve banking as deposits are lent and re-deposited where they form the basis of further loans.

This is from the Federal Reserve Act. that you linked to. Why are Treasury Securities purchased by the Federal Reserve if it a Gov't institution without shareholders?

Or are you bored because you can't back up those claims. ;)
Click to expand...
upload_2017-12-22_23-56-23.png
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
The crash is coming, folks.
Click to expand...
That can't be overemphasized. Every metric points to it. Lowering taxes on the wealthy and deregulating is what caused the great depression and the great recession. At least after the great depression, government did its job and regulated the industries that caused it. When the next big collapse happens, more than likely, almost certainly, within the next decade, we'll be fucked, but it will lend even more evidence against the idea of supply side economics. And when it inevitably doesn't work out, like we all already know it won't, rest assured, they'll blame the Democrats for it.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
This is how you turn ceefus into Squeaky.

All you need to do is ask for supporting information to its claims from the document that formed the enterprise it champions and you get a post like that above.

View attachment 4062134
Click to expand...
And here I thought you were somewhat civil. Turns out you're a troll piece of shit.

Explain to us again how the The Federal Reserve is not a government entity and a Federal Reserve Note is debt.

Fucking dumbass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top