choomer
Well-Known Member
I'll cherish this moment.
Mistrial declared in Bundy Trial
- Thread starter Rob Roy
- Start date
choomer
Well-Known Member
It's good that you couldn't fault any of the rest of it, catfish.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why do you refuse to condemn neo-nazis?It's good that you couldn't fault any of the rest of it, catfish.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Why do you focus on race so much?
I answered your question long ago.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no you didn't, you simply asked why would it be a good idea to condemn neo-nazis
which is something only a neo-nazi would do
choomer
Well-Known Member
Then quote and prove that Buckold.
I can do that simple task and it should embarrass you that you can't seem to be able to do so.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you posted a hoax this morning because you thought it was real.
choomer
Well-Known Member
I posted an uncorroborated news story YESTERDAY because it tickled my fancy and was the perfect stinkbait for a catfish like you.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
choomer
Well-Known Member
It was yesterday that I posted some bait, and even though the post has been removed, you still can't dislodge the hook in your lip.
Your bad what? Assumption? Accusation? Comprehension? Education?
The list goes on and on. )
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the fact that you can't own your constant stream of mistakes shows what an insecure little bitch you are.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Hook/lip syndrome.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Your doing your own glossary, how nice.
You take yourself and this "site" far too seriously.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
74% of people killed by extremists in the last 10 years were killed by right wing extremists not Islamic terrorists.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Source?
choomer
Well-Known Member
Thank you for that. Many here spew assertions without giving you any idea where that "information" came from and you are an exception.
But the story is about a former white supremacist Christian Picciolini and has this unlinked blurb as a nod to what you have posted:
"The data tells us this, 74% of extremist-related killings in this country in the last ten years have been carried out by right-wing extremists, not Islamic extremists."
(You had it close to word for word except you changed the last word from extremist to terrorist)Later in the article we find that it is a quote by Oren Segal of the ADL, so off to the ADL I go to search for the source story, and I find it here:
https://www.adl.org/education/resources/reports/murder-and-extremism-in-the-united-states-in-2016
and I find the source (sort of, and I have modified the quote to post numbers for percentages in red):
"Over the past 10 years (2007-2016), domestic extremists of all kinds have killed at least 372 people in the United States. Of those deaths, approximately 74% (275.2
were at the hands of right-wing extremists, about 24% (89.2 of the victims were killed by domestic Islamic extremists, and the remainder were killed by left-wing extremists (7.44)."
were at the hands of right-wing extremists, about 24% (89.2 of the victims were killed by domestic Islamic extremists, and the remainder were killed by left-wing extremists (7.44)."...and the wording here is important as the numbers are prefaced " approximately " and " about ".
Interestingly enough, the next sentence after that quote is:
"Though not the most lethal, in some ways the most troubling extremist-related murders that occurred in 2016 were the murders of police officers at the hands of black nationalists. "
are they right wing extremists now too?
But at the top of the story is:Download the whole report Murder and Extremism in the United States in 2016 (PDF).
So I go there, but it still doesn't have any definitive data (and I heartily encourage anyone to take a look and prove me wrong) as no where in that report can I find just the number "74", let alone the quote or any supporting data.
In fact the first paragraph of the document is:
The June 2016 shooting spree at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando,
Florida, by Omar Mateen—who killed 49 people and wounded 53
more—dwarfed in its lethality all other extremist-related mur
-
ders this past year. Mateen, who claimed his attack in the name
of ISIS, though there are no known connections between him
and that terror organization, achieved the dubious distinction
of being the deadliest domestic terrorist since Timothy McVeigh
bombed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995.
Florida, by Omar Mateen—who killed 49 people and wounded 53
more—dwarfed in its lethality all other extremist-related mur
-
ders this past year. Mateen, who claimed his attack in the name
of ISIS, though there are no known connections between him
and that terror organization, achieved the dubious distinction
of being the deadliest domestic terrorist since Timothy McVeigh
bombed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995.
and scan the rest of the report and this chart leaps out at me in the "NOTES ON METHODOLOGY AND SOURCES:"
I was surprised that 9/11 wasn't on the list, but then noticed the "domestic" excluding any other type of attack, so why does this chart reach all the way back to 1966?
But that aside, even in this report they offer no definitive data to back that statement.
Take a minute, see what's in it.
Sour Wreck
Well-Known Member
civil rights act of '64. white racists jumped from the democratic party to the republican party.. they hated blacks so much they chose racism over party.
similar to repubs choosing trump over party.
repubs are some messed up, confused individuals.
anyway, pissed off people do extreme things.
that's my best guess as to when right winged terrorism really took off.
Nah it probably started when they integrated baseball and saw how big Jackie Robinsons dick was.