Kiss your privacy goodbye

TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
GrowLightResearch said:
I explained it already.

You understand that website is an open to the public as a write what they want. Like Wikipedia? It's not a typo. It's just a fucked up definition. Written by someone that knows enough to be dangerous. But sure, I can explain it to them, seeing you don't understand it enough to tell them. Or would you like to throw down and say you stand behind what they say now and what that now say is correct? All you need to do is Google "specific brightness" and double check you are correct. Nope, not apparent brightness.

Unit of frequency, that may be considered a typo. Is there another unit of frequency other than Hz? Huh? You know this shit don't you?

I will explain it to them. Will you agree you are saying they are correct and I am wrong? Agreeing to that might be difficult for someone with a small dick.
Click to expand...
After reading that carefully 3 times, I still can't make any sense of it at all.

That is, short of accidentally looking at the Chinese section of an instruction manual once, the most confusing collection of language I've ever seen.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
After reading that carefully 3 times, I still can't make any sense of it at all.

That is, short of accidentally looking at the Chinese section of an instruction manual once, the most confusing collection of language I've ever seen.
Click to expand...
He keeps saying brightness and he was giving me shit for saying it.

I even have an example of how brightness and intensity are two different things but I'll let him keep digging.
 
GrowLightResearch

GrowLightResearch

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
I even have an example of how brightness and intensity are two different things but I'll let him keep digging.
Click to expand...
Keep up. @Fogdog posted the definition of Specific Brightness which said brightness was the same as Intensity which is the same as Radiance.

What does this mean? It's an issue of intensity, not of brightness
It explains nothing. I am assuming you pulled it out of your ass not knowing what in the fuck you were saying. And now you cannot explain becasue it's bullshit to begin with.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
GrowLightResearch said:
Keep up. @Fogdog posted the definition of Specific Brightness which said brightness was the same as Intensity which is the same as Radiance.

What does this mean? It's an issue of intensity, not of brightness
It explains nothing. I am assuming you pulled it out of your ass not knowing what in the fuck you were saying. And now you cannot explain becasue it's bullshit to begin with.
Click to expand...
Lol...

Keep digging you dumb m*********er.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
GrowLightResearch said:
I explained it already.

You understand that website is an open to the public as a write what they want. Like Wikipedia? It's not a typo. It's just a fucked up definition. Written by someone that knows enough to be dangerous. But sure, I can explain it to them, seeing you don't understand it enough to tell them. Or would you like to throw down and say you stand behind what they say now and what that now say is correct? All you need to do is Google "specific brightness" and double check you are correct. Nope, not apparent brightness.

Unit of frequency, that may be considered a typo. Is there another unit of frequency other than Hz? Huh? You know this shit don't you?

I will explain it to them. Will you agree you are saying they are correct and I am wrong? Agreeing to that might be difficult for someone with a small dick.
Click to expand...
Another narcissist is trying to put words in my mouth. I'm not judging anything except that you are a hopeless narcissist needy fuckhead and bloviating troll.

You won't because you are a fake take the bet because you are a fake but here it is. I'll take a screen shot of the current page regarding specific brightness. If you can get them to change it then laugh at me in a post. I'll post up screen shots of the before and after pages here and admit you are right. Let's give it a month. If no changes then you are just a fucking windbag, you'll stay away from the politics section and we'll all laugh at you because you are not very bright. (oops I said that word again)

Remember this disagreement is regarding your claim that the entry for specific brightness is technically wrong.
 
Last edited:
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Another narcissist is trying to put words in my mouth. I'm not judging anything except that you are a hopeless narcissist needy fuckhead and bloviating troll.

You won't because you are a fake take the bet because you are a fake but here it is. I'll take a screen shot of the current page regarding specific brightness. If you can get them to change it then laugh at me in a post. I'll post up screen shots of the before and after pages here and admit you are right. Let's give it a month. If no changes then you are just a fucking windbag, you'll stay away from the politics section and we'll all laugh at you because you are not very bright. (oops I said that word again)
Click to expand...
He claims to do grow light research and he doesn't understand intensity vs brightness.

He's trying to argue this shit reading from a textbook and doesn't seem to understand the actual meat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top