I bet it's a whole lot more than 30!you'd think getting banned 30 times would send the message that no one likes you
Translation:
'Forcing' a racist white person to serve a black person at a local restaurant is just as bad as 'forcibly preventing' a pedophile from engaging in the grooming and eventual statutory raping of a child.
Savage. Stay away from vulnerable children.
Jim Crow laws? I'd have ignored them. I'm an abolitionist in that regard. Others more interested in political action could have begged those laws to be changed I suppose, but the political change that did happen was simply a redirection of the force of the third party (government) which is kind of ironic.answer or reply in the red
Segregation is a key element of denying equal opportunity to services like good schools.
You repeatedly ask the same questions, and you repeatedly receive answers to those questions. You wait a few days, then you ask the same questions again whilst accusing me (and others) of being unwilling or unable to answer. You should be concerned about the current state of your mental health.Not sure how you translated my wishing everybody of every race has an equal opportunity to make their own choices about their own body and their own property into being savage. Is it wrong to self determine and right to force other people to associate with you if they don't want to ?
Does the possibility that some people might not want to associate with others give you a right to make them do so? Do you also hold prohibitionist views concerning the use of marijuana ? Do you think you have the right to prevent a person from controlling their own body? I'd say you do, since forcing an otherwise neutral behaving person to serve somebody provides evidence of that.
Also you seem unwilling or incapable of answering some of my questions.
You repeatedly ask the same questions, and you repeatedly receive answers to those questions. You wait a few days, then you ask the same questions again whilst accusing me (and others) of being unwilling or unable to answer. You should be concerned about the current state of your mental health.
Once again, yes, in some instances, it is wrong to self-determine and right to force other people to 'associate' with me even if they don't want to.
Denial of this is primitive thinking.
You're welcome.Thank you for making your opinion clear. I appreciate that clarity.
I'm sorry that you believe you have a right to force people to associate with you. I'll make sure my grandson knows to run away if he hears the name Sunny Jim.
This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought. Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned. These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".Once again, yes, in some instances, it is wrong to self-determine and right to force other people to 'associate' with me even if they don't want to.
Denial of this is primitive thinking.
Blacks never gave a shit about denial of service until those supremastic elements of state governments made sure blacks could no longer provide their own services.You're welcome.
Make sure your grandson also knows that if he denies service to a black person at his place of business because his grandfather encouraged him to ignore black people, that he would be breaking the law and subject to criminal and civil proceedings.
You're welcome.
Make sure your grandson also knows that if he denies service to a black person at his place of business because his grandfather encouraged him to ignore black people, that he would be breaking the law and subject to criminal and civil proceedings.
I have no doubt you will.I will encourage him to respect other people and to ignore bad laws.
And this statement makes no sense. Let's try to unpack it.This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought. Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned. These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".
My statement is the 'typical supremacist school of thought'? Indecipherable jargon. It seems you're struggling with the definition of 'supremacist'. There is no 'supremacy' in the Civil Rights Act. Serve customers of all races/ethnicity in your restaurant, or serve no one in your restaurant.This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought.
My reasoning has been completely 'shitcanned'? By who, you and Rob Roy? Good one.Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned.
If you're saying that you end these civil rights discussions by saying "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa," I believe you.These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".
We'll pretend that you aren't making up words like 'supremastic' to support your argument because it isn't even the most outrageous component of your statement, your statement is more outrageous when taken in its entirety.Blacks never gave a shit about denial of service until those supremastic elements of state governments made sure blacks could no longer provide their own services.
Lmao moron.Blacks never gave a shit about denial of service until those supremastic elements of state governments made sure blacks could no longer provide their own services.
Run away to the public school he goes to, or down the paved city road, or to deliver your tax payments personally?Thank you for making your opinion clear. I appreciate that clarity.
I'm sorry that you believe you have a right to force people to associate with you. I'll make sure my grandson knows to run away if he hears the name Sunny Jim.
I'm sure he/she will be a real charm at public school.I will encourage him to respect other people and to ignore bad laws.
you've got it 100% backwards.This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought. Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned. These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".
right.Blacks never gave a shit about denial of service
How do you feel about civil right laws ?Supremacist-an advocate of the supremacy of a particular group, especially one determined by race or sex.
Ill give you this, you are an expert at saying absolutely nothing. You have trouble responding directly to any statement and you simply cant answer any straight forward questions honestly. I gave you the bait in my grammar, and chewed it down to the bone because there is no substance to anything you say at all.. All im getting here is the arrogance of not having to give a shit about any other culture but your own. That is why you are....SUPREMASTIC.