UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
but none of the peers are nazis, like chomoer is.
A civil debate?
- Thread starter InigoMontoya
- Start date
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
The thing is, scientists are smart.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
but if the study hurts chomoer's sensitive feelings then it is not a good study
choomer
Well-Known Member
Unlike political posters on a weed forum?
Then the ones that claim climate change is a hoax are too?
Why did they have to change the naming of the phenomenon from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change"?
In an article on the Climate Etc. blog, John Bates, who retired last year as principal scientist of the National Climatic Data Center, accused the lead author of the 2015 NOAA “pausebuster” report of trying to “discredit” the hiatus through “flagrant manipulation of scientific integrity guidelines and scientific publication standards.”
Scientists may be smart, but it doesn't make them ethical.
No, it's a flawed study.
I could prove that. Why can't you post from its content to refute the questions people have of its veracity?
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Sure, they're smart, but they're whores, jackass.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So you're saying that it is unethical to use empirical research to prove a negative correlation between right wing blow hardedness and cognitive function but you won't condemn fascism...
Fascinating!
choomer
Well-Known Member
You still can't post anything outside of the abstract of that report to support its findings yet still cling to it as peer reviewed and unquestionable.
Show me some empirical research from that report, I dare ya.
So it would seem of abandonedintellects faves.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I don't have to.
The fact is, it's a peer reviewed study and it is still there in the scientific journal where it has been cited hundreds of times.
I don't get why you are so desperate to convince me that you are smart. I am not impressed but you insist on showing up in my alerts.
choomer
Well-Known Member
That pretty much sums up your debate acumen.
I just wanted you to say it.
It pretty much proves you talk out of your ass.
Why don't you peer review some with Buckold.
I'm sure your mutual infatuation with colonic output will be fascinating to you both.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
My ass talk just slammed you in this debate repeatedly. I don't have to "prove that I read" the study that I linked after you demanded that I cite my factual claim. You can't even prove that you read this fucking thread.That pretty much sums up your debate acumen.
I just wanted you to say it.
It pretty much proves you talk out of your ass.
Why don't you peer review some with Buckold.
I'm sure your mutual infatuation with colonic output will be fascinating to you both.
The fact is, it has been scientifically proven that conservatism and racism are negatively correlated with cognitive function. Your defense regarding the ethics of the researchers is over ruled by your unwillingness to condemn fascism.
Now go get your thesaurus and whinge about freeze peach, ya dingus.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's not exactly the term i would use for citing peer reviewed scientific studies, but then again i guess the scientists did hurt your poor feelings.
Sour Wreck
Well-Known Member
when a republican says, i'm not a scientist, but..., might as well put on waders cuz the shit is about to get deep.
fucking morons !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fucking morons !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
coloradolivin
Well-Known Member
trump voters paid more taxes than they take in tax funded services
hillary voters take more in taxes than they pay in
hillary voters take more in taxes than they pay in
Sour Wreck
Well-Known Member
how can anyone grow and support trump 
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
There is literally nothing true in this post. Even the way you worded this drivel belies bullshit assumptions. I'm actually impressed by the way that you revealed so much raw stupidity in such a short post.
Remarkable!
Sour Wreck
Well-Known Member
correct, red states take more and give less...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
FALSE
the 400~ counties hillary won are worth two thirds of our GDP
the 2600+ bumfuck loser counties trump won only account for a third of GDP
they are also sicker, more dependent on food stamps, whiter, higher rates of disability, and so on and so forth.
i'd call you a lying sack of shit but i'll just imply it instead by calling you a republican.
trump cock sucker.
Sour Wreck
Well-Known Member
well said, but republicans don't do facts