Will government shutdown make slaves of military personnel?

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
are you a slave if you file taxes ? Are you a slave when you use a social security number ?
and I now see that although your writing skills are seemingly outstanding, your reading comprehension is rather lacking.
A standing army is not prohibited by the Constitution, but instead no monies will be used to fund unless voted on ever two years. Which is done. Do you wish to discuss our Navy and Air force.

Article I Section 8 power of Congress
. To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.

That was a nice try on your part. It really was. However Congress was only supposed to raise an army after they had declared war. The navy and state militias were supposed to be sufficient, unless a war was declared.

I am not a slave, because I do not apologize for masters actions, like you do.

Discuss the Air Force in a historical constitutional context ? Why? The Free Market hadn't invented Airplanes yet.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Do you find it odd that you refer to a voluntary contract as being a legitimate instrument and then when I ask you where the voluntary contract is between the government and the people for are forced to pay for "protection" you go mute?
do you find it odd that we answer your shit constantly and the next week you are demanding to be embarrassed all over again?

you might have dementia, you rotten old pedophile racist.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
do you find it odd that we answer your shit constantly and the next week you are demanding to be embarrassed all over again?

you might have dementia, you rotten old pedophile racist.
No I find it odd that you say you answer questions, but when I constantly ask if you're okay with a white guy forcing a black guy to serve him against the black guys will, you run away with a drizzle of semi-liquid foul smelling fecal matter running down your leg without giving a direct response. That's a shitty thing to do.
 

Terps

Well-Known Member
I would just like to say good job dems. You closed the government for 3 days and received nothing in return. There's a chance to take the house and you start doing things like this this.....
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
See exhibit A below:



1. Masters' or master's, not masters.
2. If you don't apologize for your master's actions, you cease to be a slave? Cool story bro. Writing skills: 3/10.
Hello. Are you summoning your inner grammar Nazi because you still haven't figured out what property is and who can own it or are you mentally masters' , master's or masters baiting?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
That was a nice try on your part. It really was. However Congress was only supposed to raise an army after they had declared war. The navy and state militias were supposed to be sufficient, unless a war was declared.

I am not a slave, because I do not apologize for masters actions, like you do.

Discuss the Air Force in a historical constitutional context ? Why? The Free Market hadn't invented Airplanes yet.
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.
Does not say after they declare war, but they do declare war.
The reason why they have a new vote at least every two years is to follow the latter part of that sentence in bold and in red.
You are no good at this
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.
Does not say after they declare war, but they do declare war.
The reason why they have a new vote at least every two years is to follow the latter part of that sentence in bold and in red.
You are no good at this

I'm sorry I'm rebuilding my revolutionary war Air Force rocking horse powered airplane right now and don't have time to discuss this.

 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
@Rob Roy thriving to be a "smart ass" makes you look rather dumb. We can discuss how the Constitution is about the Air Force as well. They were part of Army at first, but lets us stay on the topic of you claiming that having a standing army is unconstitutional. Please show were we are not allowed a standing army. Should I wait or go watch my fishes
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I would just like to say good job dems. You closed the government for 3 days and received nothing in return. There's a chance to take the house and you start doing things like this this.....
republicans control the house, senate, and presidency, idiot.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
@Rob Roy thriving to be a "smart ass" makes you look rather dumb. We can discuss how the Constitution is about the Air Force as well. They were part of Army at first, but lets us stay on the topic of you claiming that having a standing army is unconstitutional. Please show were we are not allowed a standing army. Should I wait or go watch my fishes
Okay I'll drop the smart ass approach and go back to the know it all approach.

I would say if you had a smidge of extrapolative logic you would have ALREADY stumbled on the answer. Since the constitution forbids involuntary servitude and also REQUIRES a vote whether to maintain funding for the army, it isn't a standing army. I think my original post said something about a "standing army". Now about that Air Force thing, you do know that air planes are a free market invention right?

I've caught waaay more fish than you today. They've really been biting lately.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
that's the opposite of what happened.

does your klan chapter only do imaginary US history, or do you guys do holocaust denial as well?
I'm sorry sir, but you seem to have overlooked answering my question.

Not a member of any klan chapter, but I considered trying to get into the Clan of the Cave Bear, really liked D. Hannah in that movie.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry sir, but you seem to have overlooked answering my question.

Not a member of any klan chapter, but I considered trying to get into the Clan of the Cave Bear, really liked D. Hannah in that movie.
i was just informing you that your question presupposed an alternative reality which never happened and which you invented in order to deflect from the obvious racism and white supremacy in your visceral hatred of civil rights and racial desegregation.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i was just informing you that your question presupposed an alternative reality which never happened and which you invented in order to deflect from the obvious racism and white supremacy in your visceral hatred of civil rights and racial desegregation.
That's quite a theory you've come up with there Sigmund.

Okay let's say it didn't happen that way, in order to move on to the question of whether or not you would, today, force a black man to serve a white man against his will, on the property of the black man, no less? Scared?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Okay let's say it didn't happen that way
we don't have to suppose that it didn;t happen that way, it is historical fact that it didn;t happen that way.

you invented an imaginary alternate history because if you have to argue based on actual historical events it completely exposes you for the white supremacist and racial segregationist piece of trash that you are.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
we don't have to suppose that it didn;t happen that way, it is historical fact that it didn;t happen that way.

you invented an imaginary alternate history because if you have to argue based on actual historical events it completely exposes you for the white supremacist and racial segregationist piece of trash that you are.
So, today, what would YOU do, Poopy Pants? Would you force a black man to serve a white man against his will, on his own property ?

I wouldn't. Would you ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So, today, what would YOU do, Poopy Pants? Would you force a black man to serve a white man against his will, on his own property ?

I wouldn't. Would you ?
i'm just waiting for you to acknowledge that you invented an imaginary alternate history because if you have to argue based on actual historical events it completely exposes you for the white supremacist and racial segregationist piece of trash that you are.

unless we can both acknowledge historical facts and reality then it will be impossible for us to debate anything going forward.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i'm just waiting for you to acknowledge that you invented an imaginary alternate history because if you have to argue based on actual historical events it completely exposes you for the white supremacist and racial segregationist piece of trash that you are.

unless we can both acknowledge historical facts and reality then it will be impossible for us to debate anything going forward.
Translation = Poopy Pants is scared.

The fact is you either would or would not be good with forcing a black guy to serve a white guy against his wishes on his own property. I wouldn't force him to, it's none of my business who he associates with and how he chooses to use his own body and property.

Can you point to anything , historical documents etc, to support your argument that it would be okay to force a black guy to serve a white guy against his will on the black guys property even?

Man, you're a hardcore racist aren't you? Even TODAY, you'd still force a black guy to serve a white guy? Wow, just wow man (infuse stoner accent if you like) Frankly, I'm appalled that you would do that.
 
Top