Another white guy gun massacre.

abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
thepenofareadywriter said:
Who is we...gringo
Click to expand...
"We" refers to the thread participants. You see, before you decided to offer your two cents, you obviously did not read the thread. You just assumed you had something to add. Typical sort of shit white people do, always assume they have something to add without actually following a discussion. If you're not a gringo, don't act like one.

Nicholas Cruz is white as fuck. Just because he has a Spanish name doesn't make him Chicano or Mestizo.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
abalonehx said:
you FUCKING cunt abandonconflict, posting fake quotes from me. youre a piece of garbage you cunt!
Click to expand...
Shut up white.

"fify" is a clear indication that I distorted your quote to make a point. It is nothing at all like attributing something to you that you did not say. Don't have a meltdown and shoot up a school or church, cracker.
 
thepenofareadywriter

thepenofareadywriter

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"We" refers to the thread participants. You see, before you decided to offer your two cents, you obviously did not read the thread. You just assumed you had something to add. Typical sort of shit white people do, always assume they have something to add without actually following a discussion. If you're not a gringo, don't act like one.

Nicholas Cruz is white as fuck. Just because he has a Spanish name doesn't make him Chicano or Mestizo.
Click to expand...
Dude you have some serious issues...do you live in a board and care?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
thepenofareadywriter said:
Go take your meds...its lights outs.
Click to expand...
So no, you have no argument. I'm sick of idiot white guys thinking they deserve to be heard. Find another thread to troll, cracker.

That is unless you have a valid argument against the notion that white people are hyper-violent. Let's see it. Let's see you refute history and claim that white people haven't dominated and subjugate the planet. Let's see you argue that white people haven't committed most of the genocidal atrocities in history. Let's see you refute that white people haven't wiped out entire cultures. Let's see you refute that white people haven't been mass murdering people at schools, concerts and churches every other week lately in the US.

I'm sure you can offer something more than white noise, blondy.
 
thepenofareadywriter

thepenofareadywriter

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
So no, you have no argument. I'm sick of idiot white guys thinking they deserve to be heard. Find another thread to troll, cracker.

That is unless you have a valid argument against the notion that white people are hyper-violent. Let's see it. Let's see you refute history and claim that white people haven't dominated and subjugate the planet. Let's see you argue that white people haven't committed most of the genocidal atrocities in history. Let's see you refute that white people haven't wiped out entire cultures. Let's see you refute that white people haven't been mass murdering people at schools, concerts and churches every other week lately in the US.

I'm sure you can offer something more than white noise, blondy.
Click to expand...
Who's refuting anything ...that's the way it is in nature the strong survive...now I don't know what your skin color is and quite frankly I don't give a shit...but I bet the bottom of your feet are light skinned
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
thepenofareadywriter said:
Who's refuting anything ...that's the way it is in nature the strong survive...now I don't know what your skin color is and quite frankly I don't give a shit...but I bet the bottom of your feet are light skinned
Click to expand...
"Survival of the Fittest" is an inapt description of natural selection. In fact, the phrase was not originally coined by Charles Darwin, but by the "Laissez Faire" rightwing economist Herbert Spencer. The phrase was included in early versions of On The Origin, but not in later versions due to Darwin's acceptance of Peter Kropotkin's prevalent arguments regarding evolution.

The former notion of "Survival of the Fittest" went on to be a cliche used primarily by racists and purveyors of the pseudoscience known as "social Darwinism" to which the famous naturalist never ascribed. Funny how you'd use such an argument to support the notion that the white race is rightful in its brutality. However, you are 100% wrong in your assertion regarding nature. This is to be expected when you paraphrase a rightwing economist instead of a naturalist.
 
thepenofareadywriter

thepenofareadywriter

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"Survival of the Fittest" is an inapt description of natural selection. In fact, the phrase was not originally coined by Charles Darwin, but by the "Laissez Faire" rightwing economist Herbert Spencer. The phrase was included in early versions of On The Origin, but not in later versions due to Darwin's acceptance of Peter Kropotkin's prevalent arguments regarding evolution.

The former notion of "Survival of the Fittest" went on to be a cliche used primarily by racists and purveyors of the pseudoscience known as "social Darwinism" to which the famous naturalist never ascribed. Funny how you'd use such an argument to support the notion that the white race is rightful in its brutality. However, you are 100% wrong in your assertion regarding nature. This is to be expected when you paraphrase a rightwing economist instead of a naturalist.
Click to expand...
Call it what you like...fact is fact
 
thepenofareadywriter

thepenofareadywriter

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"We" refers to the thread participants. You see, before you decided to offer your two cents, you obviously did not read the thread. You just assumed you had something to add. Typical sort of shit white people do, always assume they have something to add without actually following a discussion. If you're not a gringo, don't act like one.

Nicholas Cruz is white as fuck. Just because he has a Spanish name doesn't make him Chicano or Mestizo.
Click to expand...
Will I will give you this...no I did not read the thread I actually thought I was at the beginning of the thread...and just because he is light skinned does not mean he is not Hispanic...but damn dude some of you people and I mean people of all skin shades...you all have some serious issues it is only obvious with all the name calling...which brings me to a bible quote(if you were blind you would have no sin...
 
Ripped Farmer

Ripped Farmer

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Actually, about 65% of all US households don't have a gun. In 1970, it was less than 50% without a gun. At this time, the majority opinion favors keeping gun ownership laws the same but those numbers are slipping too. It's just a matter of time before a super majority forces lawmakers to begin to restrict gun ownership.

This is the 18th school shooting this year. The times, the sentiment and the facts are all against maintaining status quo on this topic much longer. There will be more restrictive gun laws in the future. Today's gun manufacturers and their lobby as well as their customers who buy these high power, high rate of fire weapons have themselves to blame.

I've given up on the idea that gun owners will come together and act to reduce deaths due to gun violence.
Click to expand...
People walking on campus and shooting themselves, and also single stray bullets, do not qualify as a "school shooting" because there is no proof of an attack other than the 3 actual shootings. Yes there is a problem, but there has not been 18 school shootings this year.

These high capacity firearms have been around since before the 70's, and I see in your post that more homes had firearms in them in the 70's that compared to todays numbers. School shootins were few and far between, dispite the fact that many high school aged students left high powered rifles, shotguns and handguns in plain view in the parking lot.

What changed? We had the same firearms, high capacity mags and easier access 50 years ago, and this didn't happen like it does today.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Ripped Farmer said:
People walking on campus and shooting themselves, and also single stray bullets, do not qualify as a "school shooting" because there is no proof of an attack other than the 3 actual shootings. Yes there is a problem, but there has not been 18 school shootings this year.

These high capacity firearms have been around since before the 70's, and I see in your post that more homes had firearms in them in the 70's that compared to todays numbers. School shootins were few and far between, dispite the fact that many high school aged students left high powered rifles, shotguns and handguns in plain view in the parking lot.

What changed? We had the same firearms, high capacity mags and easier access 50 years ago, and this didn't happen like it does today.
Click to expand...
In the 1970's, most of those guns were for hunting. The decline in gun ownership tracks with decline in hunting. One thing is also true, we didn't have 300 million firearms in the country back in that day. I don't understand why anybody would even want such a weapon like the AR-15, much less why these mass shootings are more common today than 50 years ago. I also don't understand the "meh, nothing can be done" attitude.

What the right wing congress has done is to prevent even carry out studies to answer your question. They made it illegal to fund any studies by health agencies to understand this phenomenon. If I read you question right, I too think accidents with guns, mass murders and the hot spots in this country where gun related homicide rates are high are a social and legal issues, not something to be solved by regulations alone.
 
Sour Wreck

Sour Wreck

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
In the 1970's, most of those guns were for hunting. The decline in gun ownership tracks with decline in hunting. One thing is also true, we didn't have 300 million firearms in the country back in that day. I don't understand why anybody would even want such a weapon like the AR-15, much less why these mass shootings are more common today than 50 years ago. I also don't understand the "meh, nothing can be done" attitude.

What the right wing congress has done is to prevent even carry out studies to answer your question. They made it illegal to fund any studies by health agencies to understand this phenomenon. If I read you question right, I too think accidents with guns, mass murders and the hot spots in this country where gun related homicide rates are high are a social and legal issues, not something to be solved by regulations alone.
Click to expand...
they've done the same thing to cannabis research because of schedule 1.

i am god damned sick of republicans in my life
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
thepenofareadywriter said:
Will I will give you this...no I did not read the thread I actually thought I was at the beginning of the thread...and just because he is light skinned does not mean he is not Hispanic...but damn dude some of you people and I mean people of all skin shades...you all have some serious issues it is only obvious with all the name calling...which brings me to a bible quote(if you were blind you would have no sin...
Click to expand...
Why should you care if a Hispanic man calls you racist? You have all the advantages of white male elite status. Are you demanding compliance and subservience on top of all the advantages that were given to you when you were born?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top