Millions from NRA to Republicans

I

InfiniteDreams

Active Member
Why weren't ARs band under Obama (the worst president in US History)? He had 8 years?

Love it when the looney leftist cry that Trump Needs to do this, or Trump needs to do that. Whaaa! Whaa! Whaa!:finger:

When Obama didn't do jack shit.

Peanut Gallery!:clap:
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
chiqifella said:
every male school shooter was prescribed ssri's. what the fuck is wrong with you.
this is so very much a drug problem. giving unstable people experimental psychotropic drugs
including dosing children with them, IS the reason these people mass murder this way.
being male is one more commonality in these murder sprees, like guns, parents, bullets, hair, death,
bullies, blood. But the root is drugs, not sexual identity dumbass
Click to expand...
do SSRIs work differently in america than they do in the rest of the world?

because no one seems to have a problem like this besides american males, dumbass.
 
chiqifella

chiqifella

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
do SSRIs work differently in america than they do in the rest of the world?

because no one seems to have a problem like this besides american males, dumbass.
Click to expand...
catching up, thats good.
Fact is they are prescribed differently in other countries. In fact only a couple countries legally allow the advertising of these class of drugs on television. did you even know that (KaaBoom..I know right?) Only in America would a physician prescribe an under aged child an ssri for compulsive nail biting for instance, or a suicidal child -a drug that often causes thoughts of suicide.
The questions is why doctors are not held accountable for such over dosing of children- why does a doctor take the word of a mentally ill person, one needing to go to the extent of prescribing this way, that they will take the drugs as directed, when they often are not. chew on that for awhile please
 
Thedorkknight

Thedorkknight

Member
UncleBuck said:
it was the post of yours i just responded to. you don't have many posts since you just joined today and all.

Theres a huge difference between not supporting any laws, and believing additional laws wont curb a problem were facing

you're describing a prison.
Click to expand...
Oh, so youre only in favor of life saving measures as long as it fits your agenda??

See what i did there? I can willfully misinterpret your views too.

Yea, i dont like the idea of those secuirty measures either. But when you call for change, i believe those things will be more effective than what youre suggesting.

How will an assault ban stop a shooter whos already started his rampage? And dont tell me "he wouldnt be able to get his hands on one to start." Criminals have proven time and again that they can get their hands on a weapons when they want it, legally or not. You cant just sit as nd hope that the criminal didnt get his hands on one.

Or

Lets pretend your assault ban works. what if the shooter decides to use a shotgun, or pipebombs, because of the new ban. How will an assault ban stop someone using those kinds of weapons?

This is why i say an assault rifle ban would be largely ineffective. There are too many guns in the streets that criminals could get it anyways, and even if they couldnt, they would use something else to commit violence. Your way doesnt ensure safety in those scenarios, mine do
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
chiqifella said:
catching up, thats good.
Fact is they are prescribed differently in other countries. In fact only a couple countries legally allow the advertising of these class of drugs on television. did you even know that (KaaBoom..I know right?) Only in America would a physician prescribe an under aged child an ssri for compulsive nail biting for instance, or a suicidal child -a drug that often causes thoughts of suicide.
The questions is why doctors are not held accountable for such over dosing of children- why does a doctor take the word of a mentally ill person, one needing to go to the extent of prescribing this way, that they will take the drugs as directed, when they often are not. chew on that for awhile please
Click to expand...
prescription rates of SSRIs is comparable across many countries.

gun massacres are not.

obviously you missed out on the first day of logic 101 when they discussed mill's methods

and your penis is tiny and women laugh at it
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
InfiniteDreams said:
Why weren't ARs band under Obama (the worst president in US History)? He had 8 years?

Love it when the looney leftist cry that Trump Needs to do this, or Trump needs to do that. Whaaa! Whaa! Whaa!:finger:

When Obama didn't do jack shit.

Peanut Gallery!:clap:
Click to expand...
Maybe because the Republicans allowed them (assault rifles) to be sold again under the leadership of GW Bush (worst POTUS ever, until your asshole got elected).
Well-known fact that the GOP blocked every attempt by Obama to bring gun regulation to the table.
Your a tired old record that simply mouths Obama did this, Clinton did that.
Well, maybe Trump can do better to do something about gun violence in America, and reign in the NRA (LMFAO)
Oh, and it's banned, not band.
That's right though, isn't it?
Trump likes the uneducated, so you fit right in.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Thedorkknight said:
Oh, so youre only in favor of life saving measures as long as it fits your agenda??

See what i did there? I can willfully misinterpret your views too.

Yea, i dont like the idea of those secuirty measures either. But when you call for change, i believe those things will be more effective than what youre suggesting.

How will an assault ban stop a shooter whos already started his rampage? And dont tell me "he wouldnt be able to get his hands on one to start." Criminals have proven time and again that they can get their hands on a weapons when they want it, legally or not. You cant just sit as nd hope that the criminal didnt get his hands on one.

Or

Lets pretend your assault ban works. what if the shooter decides to use a shotgun, or pipebombs, because of the new ban. How will an assault ban stop someone using those kinds of weapons?

This is why i say an assault rifle ban would be largely ineffective. There are too many guns in the streets that criminals could get it anyways, and even if they couldnt, they would use something else to commit violence. Your way doesnt ensure safety in those scenarios, mine do
Click to expand...
How many pipebomb and shotgun attacks are there in countries that don't allow assault weapons?

Putting each child in solitary confinement and teaching them via closed circuit television would be "life saving" wouldn't it? Great idea. Sounds like you grew up in a wonderful country. Congrats on clearing up that cholera outbreak.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
Maybe because the Republicans allowed them (assault rifles) to be sold again under the leadership of GW Bush (worst POTUS ever, until your asshole got elected).
Well-known fact that the GOP blocked every attempt by Obama to bring gun regulation to the table.
Your a tired old record that simply mouths Obama did this, Clinton did that.
Well, maybe Trump can do better to do something about gun violence in America, and reign in the NRA (LMFAO)
Oh, and it's banned, not band.
That's right though, isn't it?
Trump likes the uneducated, so you fit right in.
Click to expand...
Nah, he just comes from a country where the "elected leader" wields supreme power. Such a man.

 
Thedorkknight

Thedorkknight

Member
Unclebaldrick said:
How many pipebomb and shotgun attacks are there in countries that don't allow assault weapons?

Putting each child in solitary confinement and teaching them via closed circuit television would be "life saving" wouldn't it? Great idea. Sounds like you grew up in a wonderful country. Congrats on clearing up that cholera outbreak.
Click to expand...
Im sure theyre compensated by violent attacks with tools available. I didnt see muslims having any issues killing people when they were running people over in Europe. Ask ariana grande how effective outlawing explosives was for her concert in the uk.

See, youre going off to the extreme side of what i offered. None of the things i listed were what youre suggesting

Lets use your technique to your philosophy. Why stop at outlawing assault rifles? Lets ban all guns. And you know what, knives are pretty dangerous too, lets take those away from everyone. Oh and hey, drunk driving racks up more deaths each year than assault rifles, so lets just ban cars and alcohol. And people die from obesity every day, so how about the governement dictate how much people can eat and when?

You see what i can do with your philosophy when i take it to an extreme end no one was talking about?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top