Johnnycannaseed1
Well-Known Member
How so?I would agree that all should be fed Optimal, which further discredits all of the "Side by Sides.
How many hobbyists, or even low-end commercial growers bother with tissue analysis, is it even viable for them to do so at this level?Have yet to see one done with leaf tissue analysis. How do you know for sure your not short changing the led plants by stuffing them with cal-mag when maybe they only need mag?
How do you know the hps plants are not on the verge of a "cal-mag" deficiency just because it is not showing in the leaf just yet?
A good majority of us have grown for many years without the need for tissue analysis and for the most part, we can get by without it
It seems to me like you are clutching at a straws with a straw man fallacy?
It looks like you are the one who is being religious lol. Clearly, you are ignoring the evidence and you are "fanatically" sticking to your position. The GML grow clearly shows a significant result, yet you are still faithfully/religiously clinging to your paradigm. Why?So answer me this, are the people religiously clinging to led tying to state that led drives photosynthesis or "increases metabolic rate" to a rate higher than the sun??
Last time I checked most nutrients that work under the sun will also grow plants under hid lighting without deficiency issues popping up all over the place.
Maybe you should try running the tests for yourself instead of wasting time presenting unfounded hypothetical arguments.
As far as I am concerned, and in light of the "evidence" HLG's claim that the 550 can replace a single-ended 1000 watter looks pretty solid from where I am sitting!