Does The Government Have The Right to Claim Ownership of The Earth's Resources?

peabody2018 said:
What word would you prefer?
Click to expand...

That's a reasonable question. I wasn't harshing on you personally on your use of the word own. I was more commenting on the corruption of the language.

I think the proper word would have been tenant, since outside control of that alleged "owned land" would make the outside controlling entity the landlord.
 
Rob Roy said:
That's a reasonable question. I wasn't harshing on you personally on your use of the word own. I was more commenting on the corruption of the language.

I think the proper word would have been tenant, since outside control of that alleged "owned land" would make the outside controlling entity the landlord.
Click to expand...
“That’s corruption of language” says the klanman who calls black people shopping “offensive force “
 
UncleBuck said:
“That’s corruption of language” says the klanman who calls black people shopping “offensive force “
Click to expand...

Thank you for providing a good example of the kind of thing I was talking about Mr. Twisty Mcword Abuser.

I don't think anybody doing business with another person on a mutual and peaceful basis is "offensive force", so your allegation is flaccid. It's only when one party would prefer not to engage in a human interaction and the other party forcibly insists on it, that rapey tactics like the ones you champion and "offensive force" come into play.

So correct me where I'm wrong... but your views include using guns to take away guns from black people who you'd then force to serve you, on his/her own property no less, and if they didn't want to, you'd use a gun, which nobody but your beloved government stooges would be allowed to have, to force them to serve you?

Is that about right ?
 
Rob Roy said:
Thank you for providing a good example of the kind of thing I was talking about Mr. Twisty Mcword Abuser.

I don't think anybody doing business with another person on a mutual and peaceful basis is "offensive force", so your allegation is flaccid. It's only when one party would prefer not to engage in a human interaction and the other party forcibly insists on it, that rapey tactics like the ones you champion and "offensive force" come into play.

So correct me where I'm wrong... but your views include using guns to take away guns from black people who you'd then force to serve you, on his/her own property no less, and if they didn't want to, you'd use a gun, which nobody but your beloved government stooges would be allowed to have, to force them to serve you?

Is that about right ?
Click to expand...

This is confusing, guns to take away guns?

Sometimes I think theres gonna be another civil war but no one will have a clear ideology...

I think Ill retreat to a cave when this happens and do like Plato with shadows for company in a new caveman matrix :D
 
londonfog said:
Rob Roy Moore feels a 12 year old can consent to sex with an adult because some 12 year olds are more mature than others
Click to expand...

Actually I said I got laid when I was 13, and fully consented to the interaction. So, in my situation it wasn't hypothetical. Of course the young lady was not an "adult" but she was older than me. Are you saying if she had been an adult that somehow our mutual boinking would have meant I'd been raped? That her lady parts would have some how become dangerous to me, if she'd only been a few years older? What would make that so?

The main thing I've said about other people consenting is the older an individual person is, the more likely they would have developed the wherewithal to consent, the younger less likely etc.

I'll allow, it's quite possible you remained in an arrested state of mental and physical maturity well into your 20s as they things do vary and don't follow a strict age guideline.

Anyway, in your case, I thought we had decided due to your excessive penchant for talking about kiddie diddling, that you weren't allowed to talk about this stuff anymore because your wife was getting suspicious of all those walks past the playground you like to take?
 
Rob Roy said:
Actually I said I got laid when I was 13, and fully consented to the interaction. So, in my situation it wasn't hypothetical. Of course the young lady was not an "adult" but she was older than me. Are you saying if she had been an adult that somehow our mutual boinking would have meant I'd been raped? That her lady parts would have some how become dangerous to me, if she'd only been a few years older? What would make that so?

The main thing I've said about other people consenting is the older an individual person is, the more likely they would have developed the wherewithal to consent, the younger less likely etc.

I'll allow, it's quite possible you remained in an arrested state of mental and physical maturity well into your 20s as they things do vary and don't follow a strict age guideline.

Anyway, in your case, I thought we had decided due to your excessive penchant for talking about kiddie diddling, that you weren't allowed to talk about this stuff anymore because your wife was getting suspicious of all those walks past the playground you like to take?
Click to expand...
Can a 12 year old consent to sexual relations with an adult...This is a yes or no question. Only requires a one word answer
 
Z3r0Z3r0 said:
This is confusing, guns to take away guns?

Sometimes I think theres gonna be another civil war but no one will have a clear ideology...

I think Ill retreat to a cave when this happens and do like Plato with shadows for company in a new caveman matrix :D
Click to expand...


Uncle Buck is one of those people that wants to legislate away guns. In order to enforce any laws, guns will be used. Uncle Buck sometimes doesn't think things thru...

upload_2018-4-18_16-11-14.jpeg
 
Well both of you seem to be at odds and I dont think I can say my stance would share either one of yours.

Most ppl like buck are just jumping on a bandwagon and really cant think for themselves. Just another trendy one he is. But Ill say same for die hard NRA supporters, yes there has to be some form of moderation when it comes to firearms or any weapon be that. But truth is a weapon can be made from anything. Attacking without a weapon can be lethal too.

Its like the war on drugs, did banning them work? No, whats needed is education and ethics. I dont even want a gun or need one, but a tool is a tool maybe if I was in fucking medocino mountains worred about mountain lions and bears and wolves and all that yeah.
 
Z3r0Z3r0 said:
Wow I see mods here are too stoned to even squash flame wars over misunderstandings ROFLMFAO
Click to expand...


London is one of my favorite people here. I wish him the best and just hope someday he'll get permission from his wife to get a real motor cycle.

His lips get tired sometimes from making vroom vroom sounds on his present bike.

598156.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top