Dude , what's your beef with me man, I came here to just say that from experience that Mars are not good lights.
no beef, we all knew that
and no.. a Mars is not on par with my current light.
again thats just a guess. if you tried 330W of mars next to 330W of your light results might be a lot more similar than you expect
When did you decide that Mars and Kind and those like it are not acceptable lights
when it was understood that they are more expensive than, and less efficient than the HPS lights they are designed to replace.
Please inform the thousands of these light users that their grows are no longer acceptable in today's standards
plenty of people using CFLs etc to grow great product. if it works for them thats awesome. I was just saying that with what we now understand about lighting and efficiency i would not buy that light in 2018, i would buy something that i can at least quantify the efficiency of. And i do speak from experience, i have not used your light in particular but i was using UFOs with their awful inefficient slug diodes when they came out in 2007.
I'm sorry youre taking it so personally. all ive ever said is you have no idea how efficient your new light is so you have no metric. The fact that "it grows good bud" and "seems better than twice the wattage of mars in the same space" literally tells us nothing. Anything ive discussed here Is just fundamentals, sorry. It has nothing to do with you or your light personally. I would literally say the same thing about ANY light on the market that doesnt provide any actual specs.
You can easily grow competition-quality cannabis with your new light, or a mars, or a CFL rig, or a COB. Youre just going to use a lot more power to do so for the less efficient lights. and efficiency is the #1 reason people are moving towards LEDs, so its relevant.