Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Just so we know there isn't any good will between us. I'm good with that.That's deep. And what I expected.
Just so we know there isn't any good will between us. I'm good with that.That's deep. And what I expected.
In the context that he made it, perhaps. In the edited and unfair way you presented it, no. But I doubt he would have either.Beats the hell outta me. Would you make that statement about Trump winning the election on November 1, 2016? If not, why not?
Again with the name calling. It's unseemly. So, when you and the wife were at the DNC party, and you toasted Trump . . . was it awkward? That couldn't have made you the most popular guy in the room.C'mon man. You celebrate your jerkitude. You should like my posts when I call you a jerk.
Context matters. I gave Trump about a 25% chance and was willing to congratulate the right wing side if they won. Big Lou called me out right away too.
He was right.
Fify.I am very dumb and grasping at straws. It's all I've got.
Let me help you out with an RIU morality lesson on stealing weed:Fify.
I doubt it would have been if he did. Democrats respect America more than Trumptards do.Again with the name calling. It's unseemly. So, when you and the wife were at the DNC party, and you toasted Trump . . . was it awkward? That couldn't have made you the most popular guy in the room.
Just to avoid any confusion later: As of November 1, 2016, despite everything you knew about Trump, you were willing to celebrate him winning the election. Ok.In the context that he made it, perhaps. In the edited and unfair way you presented it, no. But I doubt he would have either.
But what do you care? The deadbeat hasn't even sent Schuylaar her half a chicken nugget.
You Trumptards really like to twist facts into fictions that suit you. Cute.Just to avoid any confusion later: As of November 1, 2016, despite everything you knew about Trump, you were willing to celebrate him winning the election. Ok.
Lol, black-op.LOL
I'm an undercover agent.
You stated that you perhaps would have likewise celebrated a Trump victory, as of November 1, 2016. Those are untwisted facts. If you don't like me using your own words, use different words.You Trumptards really like to twist facts into fictions that suit you. Cute.
Ummmm, no. Sorry.You stated that you perhaps would have likewise celebrated a Trump victory, as of November 1, 2016. Those are untwisted facts. If you don't like me using your own words, use different words.
At the end of a hard fought campaign, recognizing the other side's win by congratulating them is the right thing to do. If you recall, Trump's campaign was all geared up to kick up a fuss about "rigged". There was no sign of decency in Trump's campaign, ever. I'm better than that.Just to avoid any confusion later: As of November 1, 2016, despite everything you knew about Trump, you were willing to celebrate him winning the election. Ok.
It's not like you bet your membership. I apologize for my comments.At the end of a hard fought campaign, recognizing the other side's win by congratulating them is the right thing to do. If you recall, Trump's campaign was all geared up to kick up a fuss about "rigged". There was no sign of decency in Trump's campaign, ever. I'm better than that.
That party we all expected to be a celebration was pretty depressing. I'd still would rather have been there with others than alone at home.
Speaking of Home Alone, Trump carried that film.At the end of a hard fought campaign, recognizing the other side's win by congratulating them is the right thing to do. If you recall, Trump's campaign was all geared up to kick up a fuss about "rigged". There was no sign of decency in Trump's campaign, ever. I'm better than that.
That party we all expected to be a celebration was pretty depressing. I still would rather have been there with others than alone at home.
Ok. Congratulating Trump on winning does place you in the minority here. If anyone else expressed the same sentiment, they would've been excoriated. I'm not suggesting that one's political affiliation is at play here, but . . . Buck never called you out. NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT.At the end of a hard fought campaign, recognizing the other side's win by congratulating them is the right thing to do. If you recall, Trump's campaign was all geared up to kick up a fuss about "rigged". There was no sign of decency in Trump's campaign, ever. I'm better than that.
That party we all expected to be a celebration was pretty depressing. I still would rather have been there with others than alone at home.
I think you are on to something, Einstein.Ok. Congratulating Trump on winning does place you in the minority here. If anyone else expressed the same sentiment, they would've been excoriated. I'm not suggesting that one's political affiliation is at play here, but . . . Buck never called you out. NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT.
Nothing to apologize for. Pablo was just being his usual jerkitude self. He showed us all how low he really is by posting and mocking a hopeful statement made without 20:20 hindsight. I can certainly handle a good-natured jab, which is how I took that post from you.It's not like you bet your membership. I apologize for my comments.