BarnBuster
Virtually Unknown Member
Last edited:
They are going fast. Daddy died in 2002 at 78 years old. He did the walking tour of France in 1944. Was shot twice and spent the rest of the war in a German POW camp.
Estimated number of living U.S: WWII veterans from 2015 to 2045
Even though 16 million Americans fought in the Second World War, the number of veterans from the conflict still alive today is falling quickly. According to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, just under one million U.S. WWII veterans were alive in 2015. The men and women who fought in the war are now in their late 80s and 90s with an average of 362 dying every day. That raises a sad and depressing question: when will the country lose the last of its WWII veterans?
The Department of Veterans Affairs uses a deterministic actuarial projection model to estimate and project the veteran population from FY2015 to FY2045. As can be seen from the following infographic, the number of living WWII veterans will steadily fall over the coming 30 years with the very last expected to pass away in 2044. That means time is swiftly running out to hear their memories of the conflict and honor their sacrifice. Frank Buckles was the last surviving U.S. veteran of the First World War. Born in 1901, he enlisted in the army in 1917 and drove ambulances and motorcycles during the war in Europe. Buckles eventually became the Honorary Chairman of the World War I Memorial Foundation and he passed away in February 2011.
Forbes
Niall McCarthy , CONTRIBUTOR
MAY 28, 2018 @ 07:57 AM
Yea, I saw that story on the TV news. I got into some dust myself.I think I've gotten something in my eye.
Is it too much to ask that we find ways to stop having so many wars, so maybe we won't need to bury so many of those who fought?Arlington Cemetery, Nearly Full, May Become More Exclusive
To preserve space for future war heroes in the country’s premier national cemetery, the Army is considering new rules that would turn away many currently eligible veterans.
By Dave Philipps, New York Times
May 28, 2018
ARLINGTON, Va. — The solemn ritual of a burial with military honors is repeated dozens of times a day, in foul weather or fair, at Arlington National Cemetery, honoring service members from privates to presidents. But in order to preserve the tradition of burial at the nation’s foremost military cemetery for future generations, the Army, which runs Arlington, says that it may have to deny it to nearly all veterans who are living today.
Arlington is running out of room. Already the final resting place for more that 420,000 veterans and their relatives, the cemetery has been adding about 7,000 more each year. At that rate, even if the last rinds of open ground around its edges are put to use, the cemetery will be completely full in about 25 years.
“We’re literally up against a wall,” said Barbara Lewandrowski, a spokeswoman for the cemetery, as she stood in the soggy grass where marble markers march up to the stone wall separating the grounds from a six-lane highway. Even that wall has been put to use, stacked three high with niches for cremated remains.
The Army wants to keep Arlington going for at least another 150 years, but with no room to grow — the grounds are hemmed in by highways and development — the only way to do so is to significantly tighten the rules for who can be buried there. That has prompted a difficult debate over what Arlington means to the nation and how to balance egalitarian ideals against the site’s physical limits.
rest of story here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/28/us/arlington-cemetery-veterans.html
Until that happens......Is it too much to ask that we find ways to stop having so many wars, so maybe we won't need to bury so many of those who fought?
With great respect, I must point out that the very best way to save a soldier's life is to not send him into battle in the first place.
...over a beer lol
Most of the ones going in there are old folks from WWII. Our new wars are tiny when compared to that one.Is it too much to ask that we find ways to stop having so many wars, so maybe we won't need to bury so many of those who fought?
With great respect, I must point out that the very best way to save a soldier's life is to not send him into battle in the first place.