Kingrow1
Well-Known Member
What im writing is written here and on many sites, why i first started doubting leds before i decided to look further into the science, i notice the led gang still dont have an answer.Name 1 more.....
I will, whilst equaling yield and quality of traditional lighting, for 40% less power consumption......
What exactly is your claim here, 40% less power would result in almost a easy third more yeild when watt for watt is taken into account. So for you your claims are leds grow one third more than hps.
So where are all these picture with a third extra yeild? Easy to see that hps out grows t5s by a small bit generally, how is it so hard for another light to prove such a big increase when its clear cfl is lesser than t5.
Led bullshit, carry on and ill just pick you apart and the rest of the site will see you have no clear answers back, your claims should be easily proved so ergo fail....