My assertions aren't proof I agree.
However I did cite the SEC and provided a link to where they explicitly state why they prosecute insider training and it states almost exactly what I said. Are you going to dispute the validity of that proof?
Other than demonstrating that you clearly don't even have a basic grasp of how the stock market works, did you have a point? The people purchasing the stocks you're dumping will never see or talk to you or your wealthy in-laws or their well connected business partner. They will acquire the stock regardless if you dump yours or not. Their decision is not dependent upon your insider trading and in no way related to it. They are completely separate events.
It can get a lot more complex but I'm not going to get into nuance when basics are a struggle.
I've shown you the SEC's own words on why they, the SEC, prosecute insider trading and you still argue why they do it? Seriously? If this is how you operate then I think I'm done.