Trump cfo weisselberg granted immunity

hotrodharley

Well-Known Member
Decriminalization - let them foist that "benefit" on you and then wait for actual legalization. "It's already not a big crime. No!"

Settle for less and that's what you wi always get. Less.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Decriminalization - let them foist that "benefit" on you and then wait for actual legalization. "It's already not a big crime. No!"

Settle for less and that's what you wi always get. Less.
nonsense. Nobody has settled for less. Your argument makes the false assumption that the movement to legalize has stopped working toward national legalization now that a few states have legalized MJ sales and growing the weed.

You'd have all or nothing?

All or nothing ends with nothing.

Example is where we are with our progress towards legalizing MJ. We've made progress. We haven't settled for less because we aren't satisfied with where we are. Still, many states have legalized it and the pressure continues to legalize.
 

dandyrandy

Well-Known Member
Capitalism is the biggest pyramid scheme ever devised and the stock market is the perfect example.
The bad thing is the poor sob working for the shareholders is hoping for a 3% raise. If shareholders can't get a 5 to 7% plus return most move on. And the company is controlled externally by pressure which tends to bust unions etc. which lowers overall wages in the area. Especially with millisecond trading. I've seen large companies like proctor and gamble screw many employees. That why the common worker is screwed. I'm glad I'm an old man.
 

hotrodharley

Well-Known Member
The bad thing is the poor sob working for the shareholders is hoping for a 3% raise. If shareholders can't get a 5 to 7% plus return most move on. And the company is controlled externally by pressure which tends to bust unions etc. which lowers overall wages in the area. Especially with millisecond trading. I've seen large companies like proctor and gamble screw many employees. That why the common worker is screwed. I'm glad I'm an old man.
I'm glad I'm old and unafraid. No dementia and I'm healthy . I remember everything i learned in the military back then. Including shoot them once. Aim for the belt buckle and keep moving.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
My assertions aren't proof I agree.

However I did cite the SEC and provided a link to where they explicitly state why they prosecute insider training and it states almost exactly what I said. Are you going to dispute the validity of that proof?



Other than demonstrating that you clearly don't even have a basic grasp of how the stock market works, did you have a point? The people purchasing the stocks you're dumping will never see or talk to you or your wealthy in-laws or their well connected business partner. They will acquire the stock regardless if you dump yours or not. Their decision is not dependent upon your insider trading and in no way related to it. They are completely separate events.

It can get a lot more complex but I'm not going to get into nuance when basics are a struggle.

I've shown you the SEC's own words on why they, the SEC, prosecute insider trading and you still argue why they do it? Seriously? If this is how you operate then I think I'm done.
You appeal to authority as if yours is the only valid view on the matter. It is a weak and lazy way to frame an argument. Also assumes you can browbeat others into accepting your proclamation without you really saying anything.

There are valid arguments (i.e. not yours) on both sides of this debate. You chose to stake your claim that there is no harm and so I say you haven't proven anything and are just a windbag until you do.
 
Top