Yes, I can see that you are not making an argument. You rarely do.
So if you think people should pay for that which they use, what is your opposition to exempting people who don't use a particular "government service" from paying for it ?
Since you so studiously read every gem I create, you, no doubt, picked up on the quotes regarding the oxymoronic term "government service" . How can an act which requires force as an integral part of it, be called a "service" ?
Are you saying when slaves were fed by their master, that created the reasoning behind maintaining their status as slaves? It's the same lame rationale you use regarding government schools. In both cases one party is denied an option and the other party sets the rules, which are backed by force. So you would be okay with a system which "allowed" slaves to buy their way out of slavery, rather than simply ending slavery promptly?