LMAO!!!
what would you like me to think bout? How we already have enough clean, carbon free power to not only supply ourselves but to also sell power to the mainland? Or how we are still dabbling in other green technology?
Who’s hating? You guys seem to have a comprehension problem.
I know there a tad pricey but they would work for me as a second car if I could afford oneabout as far as a ICE car on a tank of gas...
. I wouldn’t drive much more than 200 miles (Montreal, Toronto) in a car. If more than that I’d use my truck and camper, I like lay down naps lol. They can go 200 right? With the air on right lol.
There is a Tesla owner in NorCal that rents a garage in San Francisco and lives in his car during the week and it drives him home on the weekends. Rents are high in Frisco...I know there a tad pricey but they would work for me as a second car if I could afford one
no im not.
Only 20% of the total energy is consumed in the US for residential uses. The most believable energy scenarios that I've seen put wind contributing between 5% and 10% of the total in a non-fossil fuel energy grid. The highest numbers I've seen put wind a 20% of the total.
IckThere is a Tesla owner in NorCal that rents a garage in San Francisco and lives in his car during the week and it drives him home on the weekends. Rents are high in Frisco...
What? When you pass gas in bed it's called a sheet lifter, when you do it in your Tesla it's called a trunk opener.
When I pass gas its called a crime against humanity.
I am a real proponent of geo tech (I think I said that lol) but it too has a few environmental issues. But with out subsidies geo is out of reach for most home owners. Community loop fields are now being offered in a few communities here and that is reducing capital costs per home/business. Actually was at one today that went downOnly 20% of the total energy is consumed in the US for residential uses. The most believable energy scenarios that I've seen put wind contributing between 5% and 10% of the total in a non-fossil fuel energy grid. The highest numbers I've seen put wind a 20% of the total.
I don't know where other people are getting their levelized* cost of electricity. Wikipedia has a good article on this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source
According to the US government's numbers, onshore wind power is far less costly than photo-voltaic, much cheaper than coal and competitive with natural gas. This would make the case for building wind power farms even if it can only meet a fraction of our needs. That said, there is something screwy about their report because "advanced nuclear", which they say is cheap, doesn't even exist in commercial form right now. You know what they say about liars and numbers.
Source: Energy Information Administration's (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook released in 2015 (AEO2015). They are in dollars per megawatt-hour (2013 USD/MWh).
*The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), also known as Levelized Energy Cost (LEC), is a first-order economic assessment of the cost competitiveness of an electricity-generating system that incorporates all costs over its lifetime: initial investment, operations and maintenance, cost of fuel, cost of capital.
.
Looks a bit more comfy than the 71 Ventura I lived in for a bit at 17 lol. Had to take a job that had a shower room
.
I lived out of my VW beetle for a while. Having a garage roof over my head would have been nice at the time. The thing is though, I didn't plan on living out of my car, I had a path forward that got me into an apartment and it wasn't for long. What's going down in SF, where people with good paying jobs can't afford a home is something else altogether.Looks a bit more comfy than the 71 Ventura I lived in for a bit at 17 lol. Had to take a job that had a shower room
ummmmmmmm, excuse me? i've had two and sold them for two years.
+honesty rep
