Next on stage... ... ... Rita Fang and the Alibaba QBs!

ChiefRunningPhist

ChiefRunningPhist

Well-Known Member
diyled said:
No worries but give them time. Most business' don't operate like amazon, its $599 last time i checked.

Probably better off just buying some strips or Real qbs for that.
Click to expand...
Thanks I'll give em some time.

Ya, a lil wind got taken out the sail with the trade assurance, but I've got enough personal investment in this now to see it through. It is expensive, but it's worth it to me. I could have spent the extra money and gone through a more expensive vendor and had better peace of mind they were s6, but s5 is still very good and so I'm overall happy with the product and price, just not all the bullshit involved.
 
Last edited:
ChiefRunningPhist

ChiefRunningPhist

Well-Known Member
Ryante55 said:
How did testing go? Haha
Click to expand...
Waiting till grows done to ship em out. They wouldn't sell me another board so it'll have to wait a little longer. It'll be interesting to finally see what they test out at. I'm curious about the visible ESD flux test, the overall board flux, as well as what the flux bin of the chips they used were (the original debate).
 
ChiefRunningPhist

ChiefRunningPhist

Well-Known Member
ChiefRunningPhist said:
Waiting till grows done to ship em out. They wouldn't sell me another board so it'll have to wait a little longer. It'll be interesting to finally see what they test out at. I'm curious about the visible ESD flux test, the overall board flux, as well as what the flux bin of the chips they used were (the original debate).
Click to expand...
 
ChiefRunningPhist

ChiefRunningPhist

Well-Known Member
The lab (light lab international) I was going through isn't set up for individual LED testing. Total board flux won't be a definitive measurement when trying to acquire LM561c flux data due to the 660nm epistars skewing results.

If anyone has any suggestions of labs, reply here or inbox me.

I was going to solder a switch into the board to turn off the 660nm chips but they aren't on separate strings. :/
 
R

Ryante55

Well-Known Member
ChiefRunningPhist said:
The lab (light lab international) I was going through isn't set up for individual LED testing. Total board flux won't be a definitive measurement when trying to acquire LM561c flux data due to the 660nm epistars skewing results.

If anyone has any suggestions of labs, reply here or inbox me.

I was going to solder a switch into the board to turn off the 660nm chips but they aren't on separate strings. :/
Click to expand...
Man this is quite the process for you. I'm impressed that you haven't given up yet
 
TEKNIK

TEKNIK

Well-Known Member
ChiefRunningPhist said:
The lab (light lab international) I was going through isn't set up for individual LED testing. Total board flux won't be a definitive measurement when trying to acquire LM561c flux data due to the 660nm epistars skewing results.

If anyone has any suggestions of labs, reply here or inbox me.

I was going to solder a switch into the board to turn off the 660nm chips but they aren't on separate strings. :/
Click to expand...
I can do tests for you but in order to compare results I would need to compare it to something you know is genuine. How the fuck is a company called light lab not set up to test LED's ffs.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top