Hey,
Has anyone seen any lab tests done that chronicle a plants lineage through successive generations of cloning?
IE, the mother plant from seed was grown out and tested (generation 1), a clone taken, grown out and tested(generation 2), THEN A CLONE FROM THE CLONE taken, grown out and tested. So on and so forth.
I'm looking for evidence that says cloning a clone, of a clone, of a clone, is a viable way to keep a good phenotype alive and just as good as the original seed grown mother.
If that's not the case then keeping the original mothers from seed becomes more important in keeping a particular phenotype alive and powerful for a lone time.
Any thoughts?
Has anyone seen any lab tests done that chronicle a plants lineage through successive generations of cloning?
IE, the mother plant from seed was grown out and tested (generation 1), a clone taken, grown out and tested(generation 2), THEN A CLONE FROM THE CLONE taken, grown out and tested. So on and so forth.
I'm looking for evidence that says cloning a clone, of a clone, of a clone, is a viable way to keep a good phenotype alive and just as good as the original seed grown mother.
If that's not the case then keeping the original mothers from seed becomes more important in keeping a particular phenotype alive and powerful for a lone time.
Any thoughts?