So I keep hearing from the disenfranchised that the two party system has let them down.
We have leftover 2016 Bernie Babies who continue to imply they won't vote Dem next year unless it's Bernie.
Yesterday on the Smerconish program, with Howard ShuItz as guest, polled viewers:
View attachment 4297866
74% agreed.
26% (including myself) disagreed.
74% better be damn careful what they wish for.
If a third party can gain enough support to actually win states, then what?
In 1968, after MLK and RFK were shot (as well as after the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts were passed), former racist Democrat Gov. George Wallace of Alabama left the party and ran on his fake Law and Order Party. It was an obvious segregationist racist party that carried the south and 46 electoral votes. These states then went republican ever since.
View attachment 4297871
Do you know what happens if a third party truly emerges and no candidate gets 270 electoral votes?
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/faq.html#no270
View attachment 4297873
It goes to the house to decide. Each state delegation gets 1 (one) vote. 50 total votes. They will pick the POTUS.
The senate picks the VP.
Anybody think that's a good idea?
I have no problem with the two party system, except for the other party who elects racist jackasses for POTUS.
Thanks for voting for Trump you bunch of racist enabling wingnut fools. And why do the Democrats have to clean up the swamp again?