abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I would like to see this debate go somewhere. I'm on the side of "Double Jeopardy Applies", that upon impeachment by the house (since a sitting president can not be indicted) the senate trial leads to a verdict and that this verdict can not be revisited by further criminal litigation, double jeopardy. I will admit that all I have to go on is that Clinton was not tried by any courts after he left office and (my perception) that this is the case specifically because he was acquitted by the senate regarding the charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, criminal offenses.As I understand it. The proceedings in the Senate are a trial. If he is acquitted by the Senate then he can't be tried in federal courts for the same crimes.
@topcat may be correct in his assertion that the senate trial is political and not "criminal" (despite those charges being criminal offenses) and supporting this side of the debate, I point out the difference between civil and criminal proceedings. But that difference is that "the people" are not the plaintiff. In a senate trial of an impeached president, are "The People" the plaintiff or is Nanci Pelosi? The entire house of representatives? Or is the Senate Majority Whip the plaintiff? The entire Senate?
Last edited: