Bernie Sanders 2020

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
If it were a conspiracy theory, the content of the leaked emails wouldn't have damaged the Clinton campaign. It wasn't the time frame or speed in which the leaks were published. It was the content therein that proved DNC insiders conspired with the Clinton campaign to subvert the democratic vote in the primary

You say what was leaked was insignificant while also claiming what was leaked damaged the Clinton campaign. You can choose one, not the other
Explain, please what did the Clinton campaign have the DNC DO? Specify what they did? When you are done, explain why these actions only affected black and women Democratic voters.

Thank you for in advance for clarifying what appears to be a theory that depends on white men being superior to everybody else.

I might add a fact that disproves everything you claim:

Brazile: I found 'no evidence' Democratic primary was rigged

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/05/donna-brazile-rigged-democrats-clinton-sanders-244566
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If it were a conspiracy theory, the content of the leaked emails wouldn't have damaged the Clinton campaign. It wasn't the time frame or speed in which the leaks were published. It was the content therein that proved DNC insiders conspired with the Clinton campaign to subvert the democratic vote in the primary

You say what was leaked was insignificant while also claiming what was leaked damaged the Clinton campaign. You can choose one, not the other
Do I have your permission to post all your personal photos as I see fit, Curtis?

Or will you cry to the mods to remove them again?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Ingest that one kids..

"The content of the emails is unverifiable", yet dipshit supports prosecuting the one who leaked it..

"Hey, I didn't say shit in secret, but FUCK the guy that says I DID!"
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ingest that one kids..

"The content of the emails is unverifiable", yet dipshit supports prosecuting the one who leaked it..

"Hey, I didn't say shit in secret, but FUCK the guy that says I DID!"
How dare we prosecute the guy who boasts about releasing the information he stole

Can I steal your information and release it, Curtis?

Or will you tell the mods again?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Why would dummy support prosecution if nothing that was leaked harmed the Clinton campaign?

Not sure dumbo ever thought this one all the way through..
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
It's very strange to get down to the economics of it in disagreement. Not sure if that's ever actually happened before.. We mostly agree when it comes to social rights issues, I'm sure. But when it comes to poor v rich, haves v have nots.. establishment democrat sycophants morph into Ayn Rand herself..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It's very strange to get down to the economics of it in disagreement. Not sure if that's ever actually happened before.. We mostly agree when it comes to social rights issues, I'm sure. But when it comes to poor v rich, haves v have nots.. establishment democrat sycophants morph into Ayn Rand herself..
If we ever need advice on how to duct tape a woman’s asshole open, we’ll let you know Curtis
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Fogdog calling for Delaney moderate healthcare, WIN!

Impressive call!..

Buck still curtaling on Castro.. I mean, at least the dude has commitment..

You guys know how to pick a winner...
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Fogdog calling for Delaney moderate healthcare, WIN!

Impressive call!..

Buck still curtaling on Castro.. I mean, at least the dude has commitment..

You guys know how to pick a winner...
Nope. Not what I said. Too funny that this is how you choose to "win" a discussion.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
If it were a conspiracy theory, the content of the leaked emails wouldn't have damaged the Clinton campaign. It wasn't the time frame or speed in which the leaks were published. It was the content therein that proved DNC insiders conspired with the Clinton campaign to subvert the democratic vote in the primary

You say what was leaked was insignificant while also claiming what was leaked damaged the Clinton campaign. You can choose one, not the other
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/trump-twists-facts-on-wikileaks/

Some Trumps facts checked claims on Oct 10 2016:
  • Trump claimed that Clinton “admitted that ISIS could infiltrate with the refugees,” adding, “then why’s she letting so many people into our country?” But Clinton was talking about Jordan vetting the refugees coming into that country, not the refugees coming into the U.S.
  • Trump said Clinton wants a “single-payer” health care system, like Canada’s. But the quotes show Clinton advocating building on the United States’ employer-based system to get to “universal” coverage.
  • Trump said that longtime Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal wrote that the 2012 attack in Benghazi “was almost certainly preventable” and that Clinton’s State Department “failed to protect” U.S. personnel in Libya. But a senior writer for Newsweek wrote that, not Blumenthal.
  • Trump claimed the excerpts show Clinton supports an “open border” with “no controls over trade or immigration.” But the fuller context shows Clinton was talking about free trade, not immigration, and Clinton supports controls on both.
  • He falsely claimed that the speeches show Clinton “wants to knock the hell out of your Social Security” and Medicare. The excerpt shows Clinton supported the “framework” of a deficit-reduction plan because it involved both spending cuts and revenue increases, including to those programs. “I’m not going to sort of piecemeal all their recommendations,” one quote says.
  • Trump claims Clinton said that terrorism is “quote, not a threat to the nation.” The excepts indicate Clinton said terrorism is “not a threat to us as a nation,” meaning that it “is not going to endanger our economy or our society.” She added that terrorism is “a real threat” and “a danger to our citizens.”
  • Trump quoted the email as saying, “Needs Wall Street money to successfully run her campaign.” Clinton did not say that. She told Goldman Sachs executives that it “takes a lot of money” to campaign, and she urged them to consider the candidates’ economic policies before donating.
  • Trump falsely claimed that Wall Street is “where she gets all the money.” In fact, about 2.5 percent of her campaign funds comes from Wall Street donors. Clinton’s campaign and outside groups supporting her combined received nearly 12 percent of their total funds from Wall Street.
Clinton earned $21.6 million for the speeches between 2013 and 2015. The excerpts were contained in emails to Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta, that were hacked and released Oct. 7 by WikiLeaks.

Nearly all of the quotes cited by Trump come from a Jan. 25, 2016, email from a Clinton staffer, research director Tony Carrk, to Podesta and others involved in the campaign. The email and the attachment say they contained flagged quotes from “HWA,” which is Harry Walker Agency, Clinton’s speaker bureau.

--------------------------------

These are examples of how what you said is false.
 
Top