Jeffrey Epstein arrested for sex trafficking minors
- Thread starter captainmorgan
- Start date
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Yes, tRUmp fucks kids,even his own daughter.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
In a 2009 lawsuit against Mr. Epstein, Virginia Giuffre alleged that Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell sexually abused her starting when she was 16. She said she had been working as a changing room assistant at the Mar-a-Lago Club when Ms. Maxwell invited her to Mr. Epstein’s home with promises that she could learn massage therapy and earn a lot of money.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Well British intelligence thought that Ghislaine Maxwells father worked for the KGB, he died under mysterious circumstances. I'm sure this is all just a coincidence of course. I mean it's crazy to think that Russia would use pedo blackmail as a political tool to install a halfwit psychopath as POTUS, right?
Jefferson1977
Well-Known Member
Pieczenik was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance and James Baker. His expertise includes foreign policy, international crisis management and psychological warfare. He served the presidential administrations of Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush in the capacity of deputy assistant secretary.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Why did trump allow Epstein to recruit his rape victims out of his mar a lago club?
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
More Q crap, tRUmp saves the world lol.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
tRUmp was undercover when he raped those children, it was for the good of the country,what a load of horseshit.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
I can just imagine Putin looking over the list of possible Republican presidential candidates back in 2014 addressing his minions asking who they had what kompromat on. The spit take that must have happened when they found what they had on Trump.
I am still not convinced it wasn't "!!We have a "pee-pee tape!!"
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
This shit started long before 2014.
topcat
Well-Known Member
The Russians have proof that Trump fucks kids, even without pee involved. My guess would be during the Miss Universe Pageant in 2013. That's what I heard, many people say that, as you know.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
lol yeah, even if it isn't that, they at least have all kinds of financial dirt on him and his family. Anyway you slice it, you know how Putin must have felt when he found out about it and knew he had Trump by his ginger short hairs.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
I think Epsteins little pedo blackmail scheme started in the 1970's. It worked so well over the years that they eventually used it to install tRUmp, don't think that was it's original goal.
hillbill
Well-Known Member
We stand on the cusp of some really vile crap being exposed on some very well known and extremely wealthy people and I believe the evidence will be overwhelming and sure to involve more rich assholes from other countries.
And the president of the United States has the Massage Patriot eating dinner at the same damn table.
At The White House.
And the president of the United States has the Massage Patriot eating dinner at the same damn table.
At The White House.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
That Jeffrey Epstein Story Sure Died a Quick Death and the Reason Is Obvious
Posted at 4:00 pm on July 16, 2019 by Bonchie
Last week, news was exploding about the arrest and subsequent charging of Jeffrey Epstein, a serial pedophile and sexual abuser who had previously been let off via a sweetheart plea deal back in 2007.
Epstein’s news making ability wasn’t just about his crimes though. It was about who he was connected too, namely much of the rich and powerful in New York. The most serious contact appears to have been with Bill Clinton, who not only traveled many times with Epstein, but was also fingered on his “pedophile island” in the Caribbean by a victim.
As I wrote last week, Clinton is absolutely the most implicated major figure here and every investigative reporter that has any integrity left should be digging deep on this topic.
Every investigative journalist worth their salt should be diving deep into the Clinton and Epstein connection because it’s a flashing red light right now. Instead, we get side-stepping pieces like this one from Vanity Fair riffing about fairly irrelevant connections to Trump while ignoring the most disturbing revelations. Whether they are meaning to or not, the media are helping to cover for some really bad actors by refusing to shift their partisan rancor and follow the evidence.
That was wishful thinking though. On Friday, I tweeted this out with all the cynicism I could muster, opining that now that Sec. Acosta (the only figure with any connection to Trump) had resigned, the story would die a quick death.
Was I right? Absolutely.
The story has vanished. It’s like it never happened. We went from wall to wall coverage to radio silence, with only a few buried pieces on his finances seeing daylight. As long as Sec. Acosta was still around, the media had their hook to tie this all to Donald Trump, despite him having no serious relationship with Epstein and any possible malfeasance by prosecutors occurring over a decade before his presidency.
But when Acosta resigned at the end of the last week, that was it. The hook was gone. They couldn’t readily tie it to Trump anymore so they dropped it. This despite the fact that we know Bill Clinton lied about his interactions with Epstein in his press release on the matter.
Has any mainstream media outlet followed up on this? Anyone questioned Bill Clinton in person? Staked his house out? Stalked him in public to make him answer? Would any Republican ever be left alone over something as sensational and disturbing as the revelations about Clinton’s connections to Epstein? Of course not.
We’ve got a former President implicated in a sexual abuse scheme, on the flight logs with the underage girls, and visiting an island known for its sex trafficking…and no one outside of right wing media cares. CNN isn’t talking about, nor the major networks or newspapers. It doesn’t even appear any of those outlets are looking into it. It’s a total blackout.
What this shows is that the media never really cared about the women who were abused. It was always just another way to slap at Donald Trump. When that was no longer possible, they moved onto the next Trump outrage. It puts the moral vapidness of their profession on full display.
https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/07/16/trump-not-racist.-trump-not-racist.-trump-not-racist./
Posted at 4:00 pm on July 16, 2019 by Bonchie
Last week, news was exploding about the arrest and subsequent charging of Jeffrey Epstein, a serial pedophile and sexual abuser who had previously been let off via a sweetheart plea deal back in 2007.
Epstein’s news making ability wasn’t just about his crimes though. It was about who he was connected too, namely much of the rich and powerful in New York. The most serious contact appears to have been with Bill Clinton, who not only traveled many times with Epstein, but was also fingered on his “pedophile island” in the Caribbean by a victim.
As I wrote last week, Clinton is absolutely the most implicated major figure here and every investigative reporter that has any integrity left should be digging deep on this topic.
Every investigative journalist worth their salt should be diving deep into the Clinton and Epstein connection because it’s a flashing red light right now. Instead, we get side-stepping pieces like this one from Vanity Fair riffing about fairly irrelevant connections to Trump while ignoring the most disturbing revelations. Whether they are meaning to or not, the media are helping to cover for some really bad actors by refusing to shift their partisan rancor and follow the evidence.
That was wishful thinking though. On Friday, I tweeted this out with all the cynicism I could muster, opining that now that Sec. Acosta (the only figure with any connection to Trump) had resigned, the story would die a quick death.
Was I right? Absolutely.
The story has vanished. It’s like it never happened. We went from wall to wall coverage to radio silence, with only a few buried pieces on his finances seeing daylight. As long as Sec. Acosta was still around, the media had their hook to tie this all to Donald Trump, despite him having no serious relationship with Epstein and any possible malfeasance by prosecutors occurring over a decade before his presidency.
But when Acosta resigned at the end of the last week, that was it. The hook was gone. They couldn’t readily tie it to Trump anymore so they dropped it. This despite the fact that we know Bill Clinton lied about his interactions with Epstein in his press release on the matter.
Has any mainstream media outlet followed up on this? Anyone questioned Bill Clinton in person? Staked his house out? Stalked him in public to make him answer? Would any Republican ever be left alone over something as sensational and disturbing as the revelations about Clinton’s connections to Epstein? Of course not.
We’ve got a former President implicated in a sexual abuse scheme, on the flight logs with the underage girls, and visiting an island known for its sex trafficking…and no one outside of right wing media cares. CNN isn’t talking about, nor the major networks or newspapers. It doesn’t even appear any of those outlets are looking into it. It’s a total blackout.
What this shows is that the media never really cared about the women who were abused. It was always just another way to slap at Donald Trump. When that was no longer possible, they moved onto the next Trump outrage. It puts the moral vapidness of their profession on full display.
https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/07/16/trump-not-racist.-trump-not-racist.-trump-not-racist./
radiant Rudy
Well-Known Member
Fox News · 18 hours agoThat Jeffrey Epstein Story Sure Died a Quick Death and the Reason Is Obvious
Posted at 4:00 pm on July 16, 2019 by Bonchie
Last week, news was exploding about the arrest and subsequent charging of Jeffrey Epstein, a serial pedophile and sexual abuser who had previously been let off via a sweetheart plea deal back in 2007.
Epstein’s news making ability wasn’t just about his crimes though. It was about who he was connected too, namely much of the rich and powerful in New York. The most serious contact appears to have been with Bill Clinton, who not only traveled many times with Epstein, but was also fingered on his “pedophile island” in the Caribbean by a victim.
As I wrote last week, Clinton is absolutely the most implicated major figure here and every investigative reporter that has any integrity left should be digging deep on this topic.
Every investigative journalist worth their salt should be diving deep into the Clinton and Epstein connection because it’s a flashing red light right now. Instead, we get side-stepping pieces like this one from Vanity Fair riffing about fairly irrelevant connections to Trump while ignoring the most disturbing revelations. Whether they are meaning to or not, the media are helping to cover for some really bad actors by refusing to shift their partisan rancor and follow the evidence.
That was wishful thinking though. On Friday, I tweeted this out with all the cynicism I could muster, opining that now that Sec. Acosta (the only figure with any connection to Trump) had resigned, the story would die a quick death.
View attachment 4366306
Was I right? Absolutely.
The story has vanished. It’s like it never happened. We went from wall to wall coverage to radio silence, with only a few buried pieces on his finances seeing daylight. As long as Sec. Acosta was still around, the media had their hook to tie this all to Donald Trump, despite him having no serious relationship with Epstein and any possible malfeasance by prosecutors occurring over a decade before his presidency.
But when Acosta resigned at the end of the last week, that was it. The hook was gone. They couldn’t readily tie it to Trump anymore so they dropped it. This despite the fact that we know Bill Clinton lied about his interactions with Epstein in his press release on the matter.
View attachment 4366307
View attachment 4366308
Has any mainstream media outlet followed up on this? Anyone questioned Bill Clinton in person? Staked his house out? Stalked him in public to make him answer? Would any Republican ever be left alone over something as sensational and disturbing as the revelations about Clinton’s connections to Epstein? Of course not.
We’ve got a former President implicated in a sexual abuse scheme, on the flight logs with the underage girls, and visiting an island known for its sex trafficking…and no one outside of right wing media cares. CNN isn’t talking about, nor the major networks or newspapers. It doesn’t even appear any of those outlets are looking into it. It’s a total blackout.
What this shows is that the media never really cared about the women who were abused. It was always just another way to slap at Donald Trump. When that was no longer possible, they moved onto the next Trump outrage. It puts the moral vapidness of their profession on full display.
Jeffrey Epstein accusers' lawyer says financier abused female visitors while on work release from jail
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Your (or whoever the fuck you are quoting) assertion that the story has vanished is completely untrue. Maybe you should look outside of Breitbart and The DailyStormer for your news, anti-social, INCEL, rat-child.That Jeffrey Epstein Story Sure Died a Quick Death and the Reason Is Obvious
Posted at 4:00 pm on July 16, 2019 by Bonchie
Last week, news was exploding about the arrest and subsequent charging of Jeffrey Epstein, a serial pedophile and sexual abuser who had previously been let off via a sweetheart plea deal back in 2007.
Epstein’s news making ability wasn’t just about his crimes though. It was about who he was connected too, namely much of the rich and powerful in New York. The most serious contact appears to have been with Bill Clinton, who not only traveled many times with Epstein, but was also fingered on his “pedophile island” in the Caribbean by a victim.
As I wrote last week, Clinton is absolutely the most implicated major figure here and every investigative reporter that has any integrity left should be digging deep on this topic.
Every investigative journalist worth their salt should be diving deep into the Clinton and Epstein connection because it’s a flashing red light right now. Instead, we get side-stepping pieces like this one from Vanity Fair riffing about fairly irrelevant connections to Trump while ignoring the most disturbing revelations. Whether they are meaning to or not, the media are helping to cover for some really bad actors by refusing to shift their partisan rancor and follow the evidence.
That was wishful thinking though. On Friday, I tweeted this out with all the cynicism I could muster, opining that now that Sec. Acosta (the only figure with any connection to Trump) had resigned, the story would die a quick death.
View attachment 4366306
Was I right? Absolutely.
The story has vanished. It’s like it never happened. We went from wall to wall coverage to radio silence, with only a few buried pieces on his finances seeing daylight. As long as Sec. Acosta was still around, the media had their hook to tie this all to Donald Trump, despite him having no serious relationship with Epstein and any possible malfeasance by prosecutors occurring over a decade before his presidency.
But when Acosta resigned at the end of the last week, that was it. The hook was gone. They couldn’t readily tie it to Trump anymore so they dropped it. This despite the fact that we know Bill Clinton lied about his interactions with Epstein in his press release on the matter.
View attachment 4366307
View attachment 4366308
Has any mainstream media outlet followed up on this? Anyone questioned Bill Clinton in person? Staked his house out? Stalked him in public to make him answer? Would any Republican ever be left alone over something as sensational and disturbing as the revelations about Clinton’s connections to Epstein? Of course not.
We’ve got a former President implicated in a sexual abuse scheme, on the flight logs with the underage girls, and visiting an island known for its sex trafficking…and no one outside of right wing media cares. CNN isn’t talking about, nor the major networks or newspapers. It doesn’t even appear any of those outlets are looking into it. It’s a total blackout.
What this shows is that the media never really cared about the women who were abused. It was always just another way to slap at Donald Trump. When that was no longer possible, they moved onto the next Trump outrage. It puts the moral vapidness of their profession on full display.
Watch out... Jews and Mexicans are coming to replace you.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Too true. I know I got caught up in the anti-Bush stuff around 2006. I started to notice the same stories just with slightly different angles were being told about Obama as the ones for Bush. By the tea-party years it was pretty obvious the evangelicals and hate groups were trolling hard. I was floored when I found out about the Russian hate campaign, everything started to click into place on what happened to all of us.
Fucking Snowden... I really think whatever he gave the Russians in 2013 really drilled down what was happening for them to exploit in these forums/social media.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
I think you mean Assange. Maybe not, but his revelations had nothing to do with social media. The Russians have that figured out on their own.