Who do you think will win?

  • HLG

    Votes: 68 90.7%
  • HydroGrow

    Votes: 7 9.3%

  • Total voters
    75
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

hybridway2

Amare Shill
You should take reading on glass on and off.
Here are mine. I have them on Mrs. Perm's stuff.
Like hybrid said these are called Alphas. They were 400w greenhouse prototypes. Half of the boards are unhooked, so they run at 200w now. Nothing wrong with the other half though. Same spectrum, they are all the same spectrum except for OHD's one off lettuce rig.
Here is glass on and off. I even cleaned the glass when I hung them up a few days ago.
View attachment 4365760 View attachment 4365761
View attachment 4365764
I honestly thought these lights were blurple bullshit a few months ago, but I figured I'd try it out. I would still believe this is all bullshit if I hadn't been seeing impressive results under these lights for myself. I can't wait to see how flower goes on our plants. That's going to be the test.
Yup, took the door off. Is brighter for sure.
 

Randomblame

Well-Known Member
Yeah, you dont know?

https://www.hydrogrowled.com

Shes claiming they'll be up to 2.8 ooohmols/J electrical efficiency using top-bin Epi-Somethings (stars/leds/ect..) ran soft, using twice the amount of diodes per sq' as HLG which was their base model to work off. She took anything & everything growers had concerns about regarding the HLG QB desighns & tweaked it to work with less density issues. Which in turn should allow for closer proximity growing.
Priced decent if they indeed do outyield Premium White fixtures.
Monochromatic diodes have always costed a chunk more then mid-powered whites, so i agree with the use of top-bin Epi's in order to keep costs where they are, (under $2 a watt). You're right, UnitFarm went top-line everything, making them to small to balance manufacturing fees probably. But we know what their spectrum generally produces if its he basic 450 + 660 8 think it is that so many burples chose to use.
Also the QB desighn is the absolute least expensive to create, package & ship. Also the fastest to produce. To me that means if HLG didnt have the price set so high (used as industry sandard now) then other following QB distributors could & prob would offer these at closer to $1.05 a watt. Or we could just put the high cost on NextLight for being the first to distribute the QB style.
Originally designed for the sole purpose of drop ceiling replacement upgrade lighting. I've seen them dated back to early "16" in a KFC remodel job.
Ill be putting x2 or x3 XB-300'S against the Bar-8. Veg - Flower next run.
Just gotta get another Bar'8 & the XB's first. The hard part.

Nope, had not seen them yet but hey, they look promising...
Much better like the over prized oldtimers and efficiency should be much better.

But a few things still sound like before an make no sense to me.
The driver efficiency for instance has a big impact on yield and overall efficiency. 88 vs. 94% means 6% more power consumption/6% less efficiency for nothing. A light with 2,5μMol/J system efficiency would have 2,65μMol/J just because of the better driver. And when you connect the boards in parallel its also fail safe, if one board gets a defect the other would just get a little more current but the amount of light would still be the same(minus a little efficiency loss).
If they would sell only the boards for DIY'ers like HLG and other companies that would be a good move.

A PAR map is also not enough today.
At least total output(PPF), watts and efficiency in % or μMol/j are neccessary!!

I also don't believe it's a special 120° dome on the 3030 package(at least not on that picture in the description). The better solution for a board to optimize it for low distances would be a 150° wide angle lens. If its really something special I want to see the spectral distribution curve.

And a few things are simply not true! A better spectrum makes no 50% difference in yield. Fact is, a good blurple spectrum yields only around 1% better like 3000°k. There are many ways to skin the cat and if the goal is efficiency I would use a combo of 5600°k/CRI70 white to get the neccessary blue and green part and add 640, 670 and 730nm. That would lower the production costs, would increase efficiency and the spectral output would stay almost the same.

But that's my sight on this!
These boards are for sure a step in the right direction and now they have at least something with comparable efficiency to the QBv1 and v2. They are probably somewhere in between... The spectrum has proven to work and it maybe also fix some problems which can occur under white light(purpleling on stems and petioles for instance).
When they now start to sell the boards separately for lets say 99 bucks I see no reason not to use them.
 

Moflow

Well-Known Member
Nope, had not seen them yet but hey, they look promising...
Much better like the over prized oldtimers and efficiency should be much better.

But a few things still sound like before an make no sense to me.
The driver efficiency for instance has a big impact on yield and overall efficiency. 88 vs. 94% means 6% more power consumption/6% less efficiency for nothing. A light with 2,5μMol/J system efficiency would have 2,65μMol/J just because of the better driver. And when you connect the boards in parallel its also fail safe, if one board gets a defect the other would just get a little more current but the amount of light would still be the same(minus a little efficiency loss).
If they would sell only the boards for DIY'ers like HLG and other companies that would be a good move.

A PAR map is also not enough today.
At least total output(PPF), watts and efficiency in % or μMol/j are neccessary!!

I also don't believe it's a special 120° dome on the 3030 package(at least not on that picture in the description). The better solution for a board to optimize it for low distances would be a 150° wide angle lens. If its really something special I want to see the spectral distribution curve.

And a few things are simply not true! A better spectrum makes no 50% difference in yield. Fact is, a good blurple spectrum yields only around 1% better like 3000°k. There are many ways to skin the cat and if the goal is efficiency I would use a combo of 5600°k/CRI70 white to get the neccessary blue and green part and add 640, 670 and 730nm. That would lower the production costs, would increase efficiency and the spectral output would stay almost the same.

But that's my sight on this!
These boards are for sure a step in the right direction and now they have at least something with comparable efficiency to the QBv1 and v2. They are probably somewhere in between... The spectrum has proven to work and it maybe also fix some problems which can occur under white light(purpleling on stems and petioles for instance).
When they now start to sell the boards separately for lets say 99 bucks I see no reason not to use them.
I fired them off an email last night enquiring about boards on their own, specs, price etc for DIY purposes ..... awaiting a reply
 

Moflow

Well-Known Member
I received a reply.

Yes, we will have the option to purchase boards on their own. We will have our 35W with the integrated driver and our 50W that uses an external driver. Once we have the first round of production complete (2-3 weeks from today) we will do PPFD maps on all our products, including DIY boards. Our 50W boards will require specialized drivers however, as the volts to run them is between 70-80V, and most drivers these days are only going up to about 48V of output. Please let me know which ones you were interested in. The pricing will be $69 per 50W board and $59 per 35W board.
 

sethimus

Well-Known Member
"The driver efficiency for instance has a big impact on yield and overall efficiency."

>i dunno bro..first i heard this..sure electrical cost..

but on the yield thing.. a watt a is a watt and the readings are similar
the less efficient the driver is the less power it can supply the pcb with the less amount of photons are emitted the lower your yield is gonna be. logical thinking anyone?

and there are gonna be a lot of inefficient drivers for these boards, losing more electricity:

from the devil‘s mouth:

Our first production run of XB is 255 units. That's:

193,920 LEDs
1120 LED PCBs
800 LED Drivers
11,000 M4x5 screws
3,000 additional screws
900 wire clips
1020 hanging eyelets
why does a panel with no separate channels need more than one driver besides the owner is cheap as fuck and greedy as possible?
 
Last edited:

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
the less efficient the driver is the less power it can supply the pcb with the less amount of photons are emitted the lower your yield is gonna be. logical thinking anyone?

and there are gonna be a lot of inefficient drivers for these boards, losing more electricity:

from the devil‘s mouth:



why does a panel with no separate channels need more than one driver besides the owner is cheap as fuck and greedy as possible?
Its on-board drivers, similar to ac-cobs. Suppose to be 88%.
 

hybridway2

Amare Shill
Idk why but UnitFarm is selling at like 40-45% off guys.
@Unit Farm System Supply, wazuppy!!!
Nice prices there! How's it going?
Can we get a spectral chart / spd pls.? And maybe a brief description of why you choose your spectrum?
Can you compete with HydroGrow? Yields, growth, plant health, happy spectrum ect....
You use high quality parts. Are the diodes top-bin?
What would you recomend to get the most out of a 4x4?
Are you selling these discounted because there's a new design coming out?
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
A better spectrum makes no 50% difference in yield.
Could this be intensity related? Emmerson effect is more relevant on lower intensities, could this be the same for this sortakindablurple? In the side by side it seems like the hgl plant gets lower intensities overall which could be why hybrid says it doesnt get "led deficiencies" but the plant response to the beefed up spectrum makes it grow well even with less light.
 

Ryante55

Well-Known Member
Could this be intensity related? Emmerson effect is more relevant on lower intensities, could this be the same for this sortakindablurple? In the side by side it seems like the hgl plant gets lower intensities overall which could be why hybrid says it doesnt get "led deficiencies" but the plant response to the beefed up spectrum makes it grow well even with less light.
That's a very good point and further proves "led defeciency" isn't a real thing.
 

hybridway2

Amare Shill
Could this be intensity related? Emmerson effect is more relevant on lower intensities, could this be the same for this sortakindablurple? In the side by side it seems like the hgl plant gets lower intensities overall which could be why hybrid says it doesnt get "led deficiencies" but the plant response to the beefed up spectrum makes it grow well even with less light.
In my experience so far, these particular RGB lights do not cause the LedDefficiency Effect as far as i can tell.
That is why i aquired the old Alpha models so i can grow "White led Deffient Plants" instead of firing up the MH. Now i can stay all led.
But yes, higher intensities/densities of white led can cause a plant to get finicky & lead to LedDefficiency if not prepared or strain dependent .
 

OLD MOTHER SATIVA

Well-Known Member
the less efficient the driver is the less power it can supply the pcb with the less amount of photons are emitted the lower your yield is gonna be. logical thinking anyone?

and there are gonna be a lot of inefficient drivers for these boards, losing more electricity:

from the devil‘s mouth:



why does a panel with no separate channels need more than one driver besides the owner is cheap as fuck and greedy as possible?

Are you guys sure about this.?

...just because its not as efficient ...does that mean it doesn't deliver the same wattage?

a 300w driver is a 300 w driver as far as i know..

Why can't it just be less efficient at supplying the correct wattage..?

The last thing i profess to be is an expert

..but this is the first time i have heard this

and driver efficiency has come up more than a few times here in the last few years
 

kotobide

Well-Known Member
In my experience so far, these particular RGB lights do not cause the LedDefficiency Effect as far as i can tell.
That is why i aquired the old Alpha models so i can grow "White led Deffient Plants" instead of firing up the MH. Now i can stay all led.
But yes, higher intensities/densities of white led can cause a plant to get finicky & lead to LedDefficiency if not prepared or strain dependent .
But the blurple light is showing more red stems than the white light
 

sethimus

Well-Known Member
Are you guys sure about this.?

...just because its not as efficient ...does that mean it doesn't deliver the same wattage?

a 300w driver is a 300 w driver as far as i know..

Why can't it just be less efficient at supplying the correct wattage..?

The last thing i profess to be is an expert

..but this is the first time i have heard this

and driver efficiency has come up more than a few times here in the last few years
aren‘t we‘re talking system efficiency?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top