Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I'd give this a half like if I could.Gold ran on it, she laughed at it. Now she's all for it. Flip. Flop. Her prosecutorial record aside from weed is disappointing, the cases that I read about didn't make her look very good at all.
I think you could take your own advice. I've given several examples of why she is a phony. It's you who has decided to dig their heels in amid the evidence. I literally feel like I'm talking to her through you, you seem to be taking my opinions very personally and want to quickly to dismiss the reality and merit of the allegations presented, and for what??? You've made up your mind, you're campaigning, I'm just commenting and discussing. Your targeted onslaught of pushing Kamala all over me is turning me off to her. I'm compitent enough to know that anyone with an opinion thinks their right, it may not make them so, but to them they are. So if we both think we're right, how much is fighting going to solve anything? I know I'm not going to change your opinion, and if you don't like mine thats ok. We both have our reasons, maybe a bit of tolerance is in store?
If she wins the bid I'll give her my vote, but Id rather she didn't win the bid. I think there are better candidates. Lol but I definitely know who you are going to vote for
That bit about the laugh at MJ prosecutions is a fucked up bit of propaganda. It works well to reinforce antipathy people already have against her. The Sanders voters love to use it too. To me, it just shows how desperate people on the right and the left are to take Harris out.
I don't know if I'm going to vote for Harris but Biden has a seriously bad track record when it comes to "get tough on crime" legislation that he wrote and sponsored. From everything he's said thus far, Biden hasn't really changed from the old style Democratic party hack of 30 years ago. He's old and should retire along with Sanders. Harris, on the other hand isn't from that era and has shown she can get shit done. There are other candidates to consider and I'll continue to listen to them too. I don't understand why a "middle of the road" voter would be so opposed to somebody with a record of experience and demonstrated ability to work with others that Harris has. I read that article you posted about her and it doesn't really say that she prosecuted an innocent man. Looking at the convicted guy's complaint, it doesn't say he's innocent at all. One could say that the lawyer is using an old tactic of smearing the victim to get a guilty man off the hook. That was an unconvincing article to me.
Last edited: