You keep deciding for me which side to pick, simply because I check facts. Yes, I did briefly check your assertion about the 20 articles. What I read what that Tulsi had around twice as many articles written about her compared to your opponent. So, I'll give it to you that you're half right on that one.
Heck, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Poor use of words there, PJ. The metaphor about a broken clock merely says that repeating the same thing over and over can on occasion produce an accurate result though the underlying reason is false. You agreed that on cursory examination, Buck was correct. I get that your command of English isn't all that good so take this as encouragement to keep working at learning the language.
Now, then, about your defense of Tusli Gabbard and why Buck is steadfastly repeating the basic fact that Russian media is championing her and her statements in support of both Putin and their puppet, Assad:
I agree with Hillary Clinton's assessment: Gabbard's campaign and messaging are at risk of being weaponized by Moscow to interfere with and manipulate our election.
www.newsweek.com
TULSI GABBARD IS BEING USED BY THE RUSSIANS, AND TO A FORMER US DOUBLE AGENT, THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR
Russia may choose to covertly amplify her message by building what may look like organic and grass roots online support for her. They may take some of her talking points—such as, Assad "is not the enemy of the U.S." or that the U.S. is in "a new nuclear arms race"—and work to increase their reach across social media.
While the amplification of controversial viewpoints is a method by which Russia creates division and chaos in our political process, the solution is not to remove Gabbard, silence her, or stop the vigorous debate of far-ranging ideas. Rather, the solution is to recognize these threats and stop Russia from unnaturally amplifying any one message.
We must acknowledge that their doing so is election interference. We must not assume that Russia's alleged preference for one candidate over another means that candidate is a proxy for Moscow, or some sort of Manchurian candidate. Doing so further plays into Russia's desire to de-legitimize our democracy. Instead, we must recognize the threat that hostile intelligence can have on our core democratic institutions, and acknowledge that our adversaries seek to attack our democracy.
Russia is seeking to amplify Tulsi's divisive and pro-Russian stance. This, because her stance is both divisive as well as something the Kremlin can easily get behind. What Russia is doing is an attack on our elections system. Yet Tulsi doesn't say anything to distance herself from their help. In fact, she cries "smear campaign" when any reports appear from credible sources that point out how much troll activity in support of her is going on. Very Trump-like.
