EDITTED:
That's the thing. I wouldn't be paying it forward or doing you any favors.
After all the doe i lost, mental anguish & inconveniences left n right, I'd like to re-coupe a smidgent of that back if possible..
For Real Though, all i want is a $G (980) What i paid for the XB's n ill give that person the whole Shabang.
Honestly have No idea how It even got me to purchase before seeing the results & already knowing it was Crazy along with the Absolute Worst Reputation in the ENTIRE Industry.
Am ashamed of myself.
I will Honor my word to
@OLD MOTHER SATIVA though whom brought up a very good point during the SBD. It Would be interesting to see him compare to a very inexpensive Galaxy as they are both almost the same light at a mere fraction of the cost.
The 84X's sold at like $3/w i think up until this yr by a person who didn't even know what a Umol/J was or understand spectrum to plants.
If HydroGrow would only honor their Warranty i would zip my lip. Now they leave me no choice but to alert the public of the Cons at play.
Yup, MIA, after taking money from whomever Scammie could.
The only people who got a half way decent POS worth up to $.75/w if the spectrum was better are those models originally made with the Remote Driver like i had paid for. Then HydroGrow later notified me that those models do not have enough light density/intensity to flower a plant & they will NOT be getting lenses made for them to be added in the future, so recommended the on-board driver models promising the exposed circuitry would be getting covers sent to me asap. There are no covers or lenses in the near future (just proto diagrams), Also, all the XB's & Micro's (All new Scammie lights) got Epi-Leds instead of (non-existent) TopBin EpiStars, Which are supposedly significantly more efficient & was the primary excuse for the XB's lacking the density they were projected to have.
A Mars Hydro Board will destroy an XB.