Lush lighting...2 Dominator 2xLs... anyone interested in getting subbed up for this grow?

sandman83

sandman83

Well-Known Member
Gromiez Homiez said:
oh their fuckin w me. thanks airwalker b. im new to the forum thing homie. preesh 8 cha...
Click to expand...
yeah people will fuck with you a lot, google is your friend if someone uses a term you don't understand. welcome to the site!

Far as "shilling" goes, it is just really obvious when a new person comes along and starts promoting one particular brand over the others for no logical reasons other than brand loyalty.

If he just wants to grow and show us what he's got, that's awesome. If it's going to be 20 pages of pissing and moaning about lighting brands, spectrums, etc.... well that's not really interesting.
 
Rocket Soul

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
Rocket Soul said:
I dont make the same reading of blue travelling deeper in the leaf. Theyre talking about water, right, not leaves, when they mention travelling deeper? As far as i understand that text. Also ive seen what happens to under cannopy light where the leaves have extracted usefull light: its full of green and far red. Green afaik is what travels further into the leaf.
Click to expand...
Dug up an old favourite post; for anyone who wants to know what light the plant consumes and whats left in under the cannopy, thx to @Malocan. If hes still around:


Spectral lightmeter Gigahertz-Optik MSC15

Malocan. If you could by chance do a simple test with only a few metering points Of any difference from a fully reflective area vs anything less. Fully reflective as in white or silver floor ceiling and walls vs the normal non reflective floor and ceiling. Facing the meter up of course. Just...
www.rollitup.org
 
Abiqua

Abiqua

Well-Known Member
bk78 said:
Yeah just another cammy thing going on here is my guess.
Click to expand...
Lush was sub optimal in 2005, let alone the future......Repping these with ambiguous statements is telling. Why would anyone go out and buy a light with Cfl characteristics AND spend $1k+. ?

Thats the real tragedy, this non chalantness that costing beacoup for highest possible profit is the smartest thing and if you arent on board or havent used this type of particular shitty lighting you arent weed woke.

Bugbee lays it down, time and time again, people. Thats just one....

Too much blue, not enough red, certainly not enough from 600nm_680 or so. So no FR either, which seems applicable. Not enough green, which may drive photosynthesis most efficiently when using high PPF.
Inadequate cooling. Slug based diodes not Chip on Board.
Drop shipped.

Thats lush.
 
Last edited:
God of Agriculture

God of Agriculture

Well-Known Member
Airwalker16 said:
Lush lighting has literally ZERO infrared. Now you're just trying to start shit with me, man. You're losing your credibility if you really believe that horse shit. I told you I'm not trying to argue. Just leave it be and enjoy your grow.
Click to expand...
Credibility ?.. for not believing YOU...? LMAO...YOU must be used to running the sensitive ones away...BUT why are YOU here?.. " Literally".. and ZERO... Sounds like a contradiction to me you just can't have some and 0 at the same time...so you should figure out which one YOU stand on?... Another thing...have YOU or ANY other "group" come up with a certain ratio of how much IR...a plant should have per sqft? Just INFARED ???.... IF so please help....
 
God of Agriculture

God of Agriculture

Well-Known Member
Abiqua said:
Lush was sub optimal in 2005, let alone the future......Repping these with ambiguous statements is telling. Why would anyone go out and buy a light with Cfl characteristics AND spend $1k+. ?

Thats the real tragedy, this non chalantness that costing beacoup for highest possible profit is the smartest thing and if you arent on board or havent used this type of particular shitty lighting you arent weed woke.

Bugbee lays it down, time and time again, people. Thats just one....

Too much blue, not enough red, certainly not enough from 600nm_680 or so. So no FR either, which seems applicable. Not enough green, which may drive photosynthesis most efficiently when using high PPF.
Inadequate cooling. Slug based diodes not Chip on Board.
Drop shipped.

Thats lush.
Click to expand...
Not FR???...OR SOME? You should be very specific?... Green?..."MAY drive photosynthesis'?... really??? Blue PENETRATES FARTHER THAN RED ..Lush has enough red for MY plants...or I wonder driving their photosynthesis so rapidly? I'm willing to do this all over side by side with you date stamp Time pics and see that my photosynthesis is much more rapid than yours... Happy Grows!
 
bk78

bk78

Well-Known Member
God of Agriculture said:
Credibility ?.. for not believing YOU...? LMAO...YOU must be used to running the sensitive ones away...BUT why are YOU here?.. " Literally".. and ZERO... Sounds like a contradiction to me you just can't have some and 0 at the same time...so you should figure out which one YOU stand on?... Another thing...have YOU or ANY other "group" come up with a certain ratio of how much IR...a plant should have per sqft? Just INFARED ???.... IF so please help....
Click to expand...
you missed your “happy growing” phrase you use at the end of every post :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top