Airwalker16
Well-Known Member
I'm not claiming that the "Dominator" actually has Infrared.How is this journal any different then the lights you bought and are/were growing with?
I'm not claiming that the "Dominator" actually has Infrared.How is this journal any different then the lights you bought and are/were growing with?
Are you a shill? Be honest. You have a thread claiming you are.I'm not claiming that the "Dominator" actually has Infrared.
its another term for a transgender person.shill?
No. Its slang though. Having to do with gardening marijuanasahh thank u. is it derogitory?
What my Mars thread? Just using them to see if they're decent lighting. I don't work for them. And I can promise I'll be as transparent as possible on the results.Are you a shill? Be honest. You have a thread claiming you are.
People are just lying to you now. A shill around here at least, is someone who comes on the forums promoting a light, who works for the company, but claims they don't.shill?
yeah people will fuck with you a lot, google is your friend if someone uses a term you don't understand. welcome to the site!oh their fuckin w me. thanks airwalker b. im new to the forum thing homie. preesh 8 cha...
Dug up an old favourite post; for anyone who wants to know what light the plant consumes and whats left in under the cannopy, thx to @Malocan. If hes still around:I dont make the same reading of blue travelling deeper in the leaf. Theyre talking about water, right, not leaves, when they mention travelling deeper? As far as i understand that text. Also ive seen what happens to under cannopy light where the leaves have extracted usefull light: its full of green and far red. Green afaik is what travels further into the leaf.
Did you get them free for review purpose?What my Mars thread? Just using them to see if they're decent lighting. I don't work for them. And I can promise I'll be as transparent as possible on the results.
Lush was sub optimal in 2005, let alone the future......Repping these with ambiguous statements is telling. Why would anyone go out and buy a light with Cfl characteristics AND spend $1k+. ?Yeah just another cammy thing going on here is my guess.
If I were going to buy new Light, you know as well as anyone, i'd DIY.Did you get them free for review purpose?
Credibility ?.. for not believing YOU...? LMAO...YOU must be used to running the sensitive ones away...BUT why are YOU here?.. " Literally".. and ZERO... Sounds like a contradiction to me you just can't have some and 0 at the same time...so you should figure out which one YOU stand on?... Another thing...have YOU or ANY other "group" come up with a certain ratio of how much IR...a plant should have per sqft? Just INFARED ???.... IF so please help....Lush lighting has literally ZERO infrared. Now you're just trying to start shit with me, man. You're losing your credibility if you really believe that horse shit. I told you I'm not trying to argue. Just leave it be and enjoy your grow.
Not FR???...OR SOME? You should be very specific?... Green?..."MAY drive photosynthesis'?... really??? Blue PENETRATES FARTHER THAN RED ..Lush has enough red for MY plants...or I wonder driving their photosynthesis so rapidly? I'm willing to do this all over side by side with you date stamp Time pics and see that my photosynthesis is much more rapid than yours... Happy Grows!Lush was sub optimal in 2005, let alone the future......Repping these with ambiguous statements is telling. Why would anyone go out and buy a light with Cfl characteristics AND spend $1k+. ?
Thats the real tragedy, this non chalantness that costing beacoup for highest possible profit is the smartest thing and if you arent on board or havent used this type of particular shitty lighting you arent weed woke.
Bugbee lays it down, time and time again, people. Thats just one....
Too much blue, not enough red, certainly not enough from 600nm_680 or so. So no FR either, which seems applicable. Not enough green, which may drive photosynthesis most efficiently when using high PPF.
Inadequate cooling. Slug based diodes not Chip on Board.
Drop shipped.
Thats lush.
you missed your “happy growing” phrase you use at the end of every postCredibility ?.. for not believing YOU...? LMAO...YOU must be used to running the sensitive ones away...BUT why are YOU here?.. " Literally".. and ZERO... Sounds like a contradiction to me you just can't have some and 0 at the same time...so you should figure out which one YOU stand on?... Another thing...have YOU or ANY other "group" come up with a certain ratio of how much IR...a plant should have per sqft? Just INFARED ???.... IF so please help....
Really?...so how much IR should a plant have per sqft.. ? Happy Grows!IR ratio should be the inverse of the UV ratio .
or you could mutliply Rone's constant to the watts per linear foot to get a close estimate. .
I don't want to get too technical with you but I'd say somewhere between a decent amount and a whole bunch would be what I'd shoot for.Really?...so how much IR should a plant have per sqft.. ? Happy Grows!
" Close estimate" ..huh?. Great answer. Happy Grows!IR ratio should be the inverse of the UV ratio .
or you could mutliply Rone's constant to the watts per linear foot to get a close estimate. .