"His policies are horrible." - absolutely, for wealthy people who don't believe in paying their fair share
"They are poorly contrived and objectively pro - GOP." - Yet, when pressed about how Buttigieg, the candidate you said you support, plans to pay for his M4A who support it idea, you failed to address it. "poorly contrived". If any of them were "objectively pro - GOP", why don't any Republican politicians support them?
"he has never accomplished any progress" - beyond all the actual progress he has made during his career, like raising workers wages, increasing the budget of the VA, standing up for LGBT rights before any other Democratic candidate, supporting civil rights before any other Democratic candidate, etc., beyond all of those accomplishments, he has fewer legislative accomplishments in congress than some of his peers, that's true. But the reason it's true is because fewer of his peers support progressive legislation than don't. Fewer progressives end up in congress because corporations and special interests don't fund their campaigns, they fund campaigns of Democrats who will be friendly to their own interests. 95% of federal campaigns who spend the most money win elections. It has nothing to do with the validity or support of their ideas, policies, or positions, because when you poll the electorate, progressive positions usually win.