Bolton book, Ukraine aid freeze tied to Biden

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Naa thats what you stand for ..repubs dont go around convincing ppl they are oppressed and victims..that they deserve reperations for their ancestors. Bahahah we want equal rights" gtfoh i bet you will vote for slimey joe because he thinks drunk driving is ok..which you do.
Well they/you sure seem to blame a lot of people for your struggles in life though. It’s the immigrants fault we don’t have jobs that we don’t want. It’s the environmental laws that have taken away our right to kill the planet. It’s equal rights that are destroying our right to be the master race. In a nutshell it seems it’s everyones fault for your failures and lack of success in life.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Paul Manafort and Rudy’s Indicted Associate Igor Fruman Go Way, Way Back

BUDS
The relationship—stretching from New York to London to Kyiv—long predated Rudy Giuliani’s attempts to discredit the evidence that played a key role in Manafort’s downfall.


The web of connections between Donald Trump’s convicted campaign manager and an indicted man who tried to dig up dirt on his political rival runs tighter and longer than previously understood.

Rudy Giuliani ally Igor Fruman and ex-Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort have been friendly for years, two sources familiar with their relationship tell The Daily Beast.

And that relationship — stretching from New York to London to Kyiv — long predated Rudy Giuliani’s wide-ranging attempts to discredit the evidence that played a key role in kicking off Manafort's political downfall and eventual incarceration.

Joseph Bondy, the lawyer for Fruman associate Lev Parnas, said Manafort and Fruman were friendly for years before their respective indictments.

A friend of Manafort’s, who spoke anonymously to discuss non-public matters, confirmed that Fruman and Manafort have known each other for years. He said Fruman invited Manafort to the opening party for Buddha-Bar in Kyiv many years ago, and that the two men have discussed business. Buddha-Bar opened in the summer of 2008. Bondy said the pair also spent time together in London and New York.
more...
 

PhatNuggz

Well-Known Member
Like you spinless bitches want to hear from witnesses! Please! You don't want any evidence either. You don't have the balls!

Read the damn transcript instead of listening to the lies your fav fake news outlets tell you. And this is from CNN www, no less. I guess they figure they've dummed you down to such a point you won't bother because you trust them 100%. And while your doing so, remember there is actual video of Creepy Joe B threatening them unless they fire the prosecutor

 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Read the damn transcript instead of listening to the lies your fav fake news outlets tell you. And this is from CNN www, no less. I guess they figure they've dummed you down to such a point you won't bother because you trust them 100%. And while your doing so, remember there is actual video of Creepy Joe B threatening them unless they fire the prosecutor


We rate this statement False.
 

HolyAngel

Well-Known Member
Read the damn transcript instead of listening to the lies your fav fake news outlets tell you. And this is from CNN www, no less. I guess they figure they've dummed you down to such a point you won't bother because you trust them 100%. And while your doing so, remember there is actual video of Creepy Joe B threatening them unless they fire the prosecutor

You mean the MEMORANDUM of the transcript? WE DON'T HAVE THE ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT, the "transcript" that is released is only a supposed summary from the white house itself of the actual transcript. They won't release the actual transcript. I've still read it a few times and heard all of it from watching all the testimony.

Trump is guilty af and there's no question about it. His counsel hasn't denied it, the republicans didn't deny it in the House. All his lawyers/counsel are doing is reciting the Narcissists Prayer on international tv to the world. Dershowitz literally said yesterday that any president could be corrupt as humanly possible and there's nothing anyone can do about it. That he can solicit anything from any other country, even to interfere with our own elections to secure his own re-election, and there's nothing anyone can do about it if he thinks it's in the country's best interest. Trumps counsel also said you can't indict a president for a crime, but then turned around and said you can't impeach one without a crime, ergo he can do no wrong. All of that is absolutely crazy and clearly wrong by anyone with a brain.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member

We rate this statement False.
From their actions this week, it's clear that Trump and his party leaders in the GOP are angry about the removal of that corrupt prosecutor. Since when does Trump actually drain swamps of corruption in other countries? Not in the US either.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
From their actions this week, it's clear that Trump and his party leaders in the GOP are angry about the removal of that corrupt prosecutor. Since when does Trump actually drain swamps of corruption in other countries? Not in the US either.
Let's not forget that he has expressed his desire to do away with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. He whined that it was “just so unfair that American companies aren’t allowed to pay bribes to get business overseas,”

Only imbeciles think Trump is anti-corruption.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
This is interesting, Bolton missed his chance in IMHO, he should have been making statements to the press last night and going on the talking head shows. Maybe he wants to blind side the GOP senate? This is an invitation to be called by the house... Now that Trump is blocking publication of his book (money), he'll come forward to juice up the sales when it is sold with interviews, statements and testimony. Maybe his next book will be called,"Doing Donald, inside his ass".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Bolton defends Trump administration officials who testified in House impeachment inquiry

Washington (CNN)Former national security adviser John Bolton, who has been a central figure in Democrats' fight to hear from witnesses in the Senate trial, defended on Thursday Trump administration officials who testified as part of the House impeachment inquiry.
"All of them acted in the best interest of the country as they saw it and consistent to what they thought our policies were," Bolton said during a private event in Austin, Texas, according to CNN affiliate KXAN.
His comments came a day before the Senate votes Friday on whether to seek additional witnesses, including whether to hear from Bolton about his explosive allegation in the Ukraine scandal. It became clearer on Thursday night that the Senate trial is all but certain to come to a swift end without hearing from witnesses or subpoenaing documents.

Impeachment trial to end but its aftershocks will rock America
Bolton said members of the Trump administration should "feel they're able to speak their minds without retribution."
"The idea that somehow testifying to what you think is true is destructive to the system of government we have, I think, is very nearly the reverse -- the exact reverse of the truth," he said.

Bolton has said he's willing to testify in the Senate trial if he is subpoenaed. The House had sought his testimony but ultimately never subpoenaed Bolton.
In his forthcoming book, Bolton alleges that Trump told him over the summer that he wanted to continue holding military aid to Ukraine until the country helped with investigations into his potential political opponents, according to a draft manuscript first reported by The New York Times. A source with direct knowledge of the manuscript has told CNN the Times' telling of Bolton's discussion with Trump is accurate.
On Wednesday, Trump attacked Bolton on Twitter and claimed his forthcoming book is "nasty and untrue."
The administration has repeatedly cited national security concerns as to why they would not want Bolton and other current and former administration officials to testify in the Senate trial.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has argued that allowing witnesses would lead to an indefinite delay in the trial, prompt executive privilege concerns and have no impact on the outcome of the trial.
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Let's not forget that he has expressed his desire to do away with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. He whined that it was “just so unfair that American companies aren’t allowed to pay bribes to get business overseas,”

Only imbeciles think Trump is anti-corruption.
I don't think GOP Senators are imbeciles but agree that they don't really care about corruption. They claimed to care this week, though.
 

PhatNuggz

Well-Known Member
You mean the MEMORANDUM of the transcript? WE DON'T HAVE THE ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT, the "transcript" that is released is only a supposed summary from the white house itself of the actual transcript. They won't release the actual transcript. I've still read it a few times and heard all of it from watching all the testimony.

Trump is guilty af and there's no question about it. His counsel hasn't denied it, the republicans didn't deny it in the House. All his lawyers/counsel are doing is reciting the Narcissists Prayer on international tv to the world. Dershowitz literally said yesterday that any president could be corrupt as humanly possible and there's nothing anyone can do about it. That he can solicit anything from any other country, even to interfere with our own elections to secure his own re-election, and there's nothing anyone can do about it if he thinks it's in the country's best interest. Trumps counsel also said you can't indict a president for a crime, but then turned around and said you can't impeach one without a crime, ergo he can do no wrong. All of that is absolutely crazy and clearly wrong by anyone with a brain.
no question about it? OMG ROFLMAO
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
This is interesting, Bolton missed his chance in IMHO, he should have been making statements to the press last night and going on the talking head shows. Maybe he wants to blind side the GOP senate? This is an invitation to be called by the house... Now that Trump is blocking publication of his book (money), he'll come forward to juice up the sales when it is sold with interviews, statements and testimony. Maybe his next book will be called,"Doing Donald, inside his ass".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Bolton defends Trump administration officials who testified in House impeachment inquiry

Washington (CNN)Former national security adviser John Bolton, who has been a central figure in Democrats' fight to hear from witnesses in the Senate trial, defended on Thursday Trump administration officials who testified as part of the House impeachment inquiry.
"All of them acted in the best interest of the country as they saw it and consistent to what they thought our policies were," Bolton said during a private event in Austin, Texas, according to CNN affiliate KXAN.
His comments came a day before the Senate votes Friday on whether to seek additional witnesses, including whether to hear from Bolton about his explosive allegation in the Ukraine scandal. It became clearer on Thursday night that the Senate trial is all but certain to come to a swift end without hearing from witnesses or subpoenaing documents.

Impeachment trial to end but its aftershocks will rock America
Bolton said members of the Trump administration should "feel they're able to speak their minds without retribution."
"The idea that somehow testifying to what you think is true is destructive to the system of government we have, I think, is very nearly the reverse -- the exact reverse of the truth," he said.

Bolton has said he's willing to testify in the Senate trial if he is subpoenaed. The House had sought his testimony but ultimately never subpoenaed Bolton.
In his forthcoming book, Bolton alleges that Trump told him over the summer that he wanted to continue holding military aid to Ukraine until the country helped with investigations into his potential political opponents, according to a draft manuscript first reported by The New York Times. A source with direct knowledge of the manuscript has told CNN the Times' telling of Bolton's discussion with Trump is accurate.
On Wednesday, Trump attacked Bolton on Twitter and claimed his forthcoming book is "nasty and untrue."
The administration has repeatedly cited national security concerns as to why they would not want Bolton and other current and former administration officials to testify in the Senate trial.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has argued that allowing witnesses would lead to an indefinite delay in the trial, prompt executive privilege concerns and have no impact on the outcome of the trial.
too fvcking late..he could've testified for the House when subpoenaed but he didn't- fvcking cash you know- the people that would allow our country this are treasonous in their own right.

i wish our founders were here to see this.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Read the damn transcript instead of listening to the lies your fav fake news outlets tell you. And this is from CNN www, no less. I guess they figure they've dummed you down to such a point you won't bother because you trust them 100%. And while your doing so, remember there is actual video of Creepy Joe B threatening them unless they fire the prosecutor

Hillbilly- have you ever read the signs that maga supporters write? you can't even spell..you know that right? right? white supremacy will take a backseat until you learn how to spell..

1580579670881.png
1580579699404.png
1580579724744.png
 
Last edited:
Top