Thanks. I've found that one actually, in the thread @twalte posted about the article they did. When I looked through the article for a link to the actual "scientific" study, the link was broken. But I did find it after. (Of course, I found another article saying the opposite as well, claiming to have "scientists" and teams of "Ph.Ds" that showed flushing had merit, blah blah. And the links just brought you to the flushing products they were trying to sell - brought to you by advanced nutrients, hah. So it sounded similar to the RXgreentech company's angle, only the opposite, until I found their actual study.)Lovely plant, and if you are curious about flushing here's a good article:
Cannabis Flushing Study on Grow Nutrients I Rx Green
Rx Green’s research study on cannabis flushing explores the truth behind this urban myth in growing nutrients.www.rxgreentechnologies.com
I grow in Coco/perlite every 2 weeks I flush with a low PPM solution to set up an osmotic gradient to leach my grow medium of excess salt build up. I feed to the end.
And then the one study by Stemeroff from the university of guelph(?) which touched on it as well (and I haven't read either in their entirety yet; haven't had the time).
I also looked into and found some good information on senescence.
This is what I was looking/asking for; actual scientific research or studies, etc. that might have been done, that would support one result or the other, or some other "unpredicted" result. Not slogan level, over simplified "advice" like "Don't put stuff in the plant you don't want in there" - which isn't "wrong", it's just so vague and useless it gives nothing in the way of an answer or approach to take. And not misrepresentations of the actual concept (or misconceptions) or thought process of those who have been flushing for however long.
But like Thundercat said, probably shouldn't clutter this guys thread up with it, fair enough. So I won't post about it here anymore.
Thanks for posting the link.