Bernie isn’t expanding the electorate

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
you support the windmill cancer guy, right?

The one who slurs his words and sniffs like a drug addict?
Who's that?

I actually liked the way Andy Yang talked. He was prolly the guy that made the most sense, just used logic a lot. That, and an extra $1k per month free money that I won't need to worry about paying back (my grandkids will) made him a favorite.

But, the dems are offering a bunch of old white guy billionaires, and a commie.
From whats left, I think I'd pick Bloomberg, or, yea, Trump.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Who's that?

I actually liked the way Andy Yang talked. He was prolly the guy that made the most sense, just used logic a lot. That, and an extra $1k per month free money that I won't need to worry about paying back (my grandkids will) made him a favorite.

But, the dems are offering a bunch of old white guy billionaires, and a commie.
From whats left, I think I'd pick Bloomberg, or, yea, Trump.
you support the windmill cancer guy who praises neo nazis and bragged about creeping in on unsuspecting naked underage children?

You must be very educated
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Who's that?

I actually liked the way Andy Yang talked. He was prolly the guy that made the most sense, just used logic a lot. That, and an extra $1k per month free money that I won't need to worry about paying back (my grandkids will) made him a favorite.

But, the dems are offering a bunch of old white guy billionaires, and a commie.
From whats left, I think I'd pick Bloomberg, or, yea, Trump.
Do you really think that line is going to stick if Biden is elected? The one politician who did not cash in what 40 years while holding public office? Because I don't.
 

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
Do you really think that line is going to stick if Biden is elected? The one Senator who did not cash in while holding public office? Because I don't.
Biden isn't going to be elected.
Hell, he can't string together a sentence
I feel bad for him most of the time: he is actually a decent guy. Has good intentions. But ... jeeze, he needs to retire. His time has passed, just like Clinton.

you support the windmill cancer guy
I don't know who that is, really.
Tell me ... who do I support?
I haven't really made my mind up yet, but, hey, you tell me .... who do I support?
 

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
the windmill cancer retard who praises neo nazis and brags about creeping in on unsuspecting naked underage children

Because you’re educated
When you can think of his name, we can talk about it. I dunno who you talking about.

So, maybe use those terms to find out who .... and get back to me.
Ok Henny Penny?
 

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
EXTRA EXTRA Read all about it!

Convicted pedo prefers Donald Trump!

Read all about it!
Oh, have you been assimilated? You weren't there last time we talked, you were still thinking, I think.
Have they lobotomized you already?
Sad.

Did they let you keep your balls, or did you email them in to Hillary?
Be careful, that's next.
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
Nope I think it all needs to be stopped, militarizing data against people is wrong and too powerful of a weapon. If entities are being found to be doing this, they should be held accountable.
I think I am starting to understand your position. So advertising is just as bad?

Facebook isn't a 'news' company.
I brought up facebook because they were caught performing psychology experiments on unsuspecting, unconsenting people. Just thought it was interesting because that is direct subconscious manipulation of the populace (albeit to make them happier) and they got a pass, but someone else using arguments (ads) to convince is somehow bad.

Ps, the whole thing with the dr li and grooming gang whistleblowers is that the state says they are criminals and tries to silence them, while they are demonstrably trying to work for the populace and the populace holds them as heros. They are good examples of why trying to police speech is bad. If they had been allowed to speak they could have saved lives. If what they were saying was false it could be disproved or argued against. Censorship is the last tool of a failing position and people recognise it, much like name calling. Censorship in both these cases eroded trust in the state.

I don't think our politics are really that different, most people are about center. The main thing I think, is that some people believe that lines can be drawn and redrawn for example with what is acceptable speech or advertising as the needs of society change. I think this is a very reasonable position. Others, like myself, like to take everything to one logical end or the other, and I personally believe it's wrong to impose on others period (ie all censorship is wrong and all actions (advertisements) are ok, barring murder and other acts that would prevent society from working).
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
From whats left, I think I'd pick Bloomberg
Honest question, but do americans see bloomberg as a serious candidate? I never really thought he was. Just trying to get free publicity maybe? I dunno how you could consider voting someone to office that is on record saying how he is a businessman, and to do business in china you have to say what they want you to (re his newspaper).
 

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
Honest question, but do americans see bloomberg as a serious candidate? I never really thought he was. Just trying to get free publicity maybe? I dunno how you could consider voting someone to office that is on record saying how he is a businessman, and to do business in china you have to say what they want you to (re his newspaper).
No. I don't think so.
But, remember ... perspective.

Pretend YOU are the grand-pubah of the DNC. Ok? Now, this is what you KNOW. You know that your party can not win the white house in 20. No way. No body that is in this thing can take it.
You know that if Bernie wins it could be the end of the party. The voters in America will not elect a commie. Sorry, won't happen. You might just blow up the whole party with Bernie running in 20.

So, what's the next best thing you can do FOR YOUR PARTY? ?
Make sure that you keep the Congress? Maybe, just maybe get a couple seats in Senate? Help out a couple of Dem Governors? and be patient. Make it to 2024 while mitigating the damage.
Who's the best to do that? A guy that has tons of money, and doesn't mind spending it. A guy that can be steered and programmed and puppeted to say what you want him to say. He will get the Dem message out to many, and he doesn't care if it costs million$.

So ... Bern will not have enough votes to take it in the first round. Then the super delegates (who you have in your pocket) will vote the way you want them to - and Bernie is OUT.

It's the way I see it FOR NOW.
Things can change, but if the convention were to happen now -- that's the way it will go down.

And, ya know, I could vote for Blumeberg. He's got no personality; but I like his action when it comes to interpersonal relationships with women, and legal relationships with gang-bangers in the 'hood, and business relationships with foreign countries.

He could be the guy.
He just might be a DINO.

PS: Thanks for an intelligent, well thought-out question and input. It is really, really rare here. I look forward to a further discussion. You see something different? I could be wrong.
Naw ...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No. I don't think so.
But, remember ... perspective.

Pretend YOU are the grand-pubah of the DNC. Ok? Now, this is what you KNOW. You know that your party can not win the white house in 20. No way. No body that is in this thing can take it.
You know that if Bernie wins it could be the end of the party. The voters in America will not elect a commie. Sorry, won't happen. You might just blow up the whole party with Bernie running in 20.

So, what's the next best thing you can do FOR YOUR PARTY? ?
Make sure that you keep the Congress? Maybe, just maybe get a couple seats in Senate? Help out a couple of Dem Governors? and be patient. Make it to 2024 while mitigating the damage.
Who's the best to do that? A guy that has tons of money, and doesn't mind spending it. A guy that can be steered and programmed and puppeted to say what you want him to say. He will get the Dem message out to many, and he doesn't care if it costs million$.

So ... Bern will not have enough votes to take it in the first round. Then the super delegates (who you have in your pocket) will vote the way you want them to - and Bernie is OUT.

It's the way I see it FOR NOW.
Things can change, but if the convention were to happen now -- that's the way it will go down.

And, ya know, I could vote for Blumeberg. He's got no personality; but I like his action when it comes to interpersonal relationships with women, and legal relationships with gang-bangers in the 'hood, and business relationships with foreign countries.

He could be the guy.
He just might be a DINO.

PS: Thanks for an intelligent, well thought-out question and input. It is really, really rare here. I look forward to a further discussion. You see something different? I could be wrong.
Naw ...
youre a blowhard
 
Top