rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
probert v grim reaper were awesome. they had about 5 really good tilts if memory servesI loved watching Rob Probert fight lol
probert v grim reaper were awesome. they had about 5 really good tilts if memory servesI loved watching Rob Probert fight lol
This is where padaraper posts screen shots made a month ago when Sanders looked to be the outright winner.
Statistics that don't support our conclusions are a lie. RIGGED STATE!!! RIGGED STATE!!!This is where padaraper posts screen shots made a month ago when Sanders looked to be the outright winner.
People who don't understand statistics shouldn't use them.
i listened to bits of it. pretty sad. blames everybody but himself. boo hoo.Word is Bernie is having a meltdown at a press event this afternoon, described as tRUmp like lol.
HmmDefinitely impressive how a big win in an early primary state, and fellow moderates jumping out of the race and supporting Biden can cause a massive shift in the odds.
Dino Ciccerelli is still my favorite of all time.I loved watching Rob Probert fight lol
Please don't put something in quotes, when I've never said anything remotely close to that.Hmm
Sanders supporters have difficulty with facts. Sanders started out worse than he did in 2016 and went downhill from there. Just look at the numbers if you don't believe me. Bernie was never a Democrat, always ran against the Democratic Party and a vote for Bernie was a vote for Trump in the fall. That's the truth. It's why Democrats voted against him and for Biden.
You: "Democrats voted in droves against their self interest".
that guy is mentally ill.Please don't put something in quotes, when I've never said anything remotely close to that.
Why you so salty today?that guy is mentally ill.
Just look at your statement:Please don't put something in quotes, when I've never said anything remotely close to that.
You are saying that Democrats acted as a group to a series of unrelated and unimportant events to cause a huge shift in the outlook of the race rather than because PEOPLE actually gave their votes some thought.Definitely impressive how a big win in an early primary state, and fellow moderates jumping out of the race and supporting Biden can cause a massive shift in the odds.
Nah dude it was rigged!Just look at your statement:
You are saying that Democrats acted as a group to a series of unrelated and unimportant events to cause a huge shift in the outlook of the race rather than because PEOPLE actually gave their votes some thought.
In context of your affiliation with the Bernie faction, who do in fact use the term "against their self interest" and "droves" to diminish people who didn't vote for Bernie , I paraphrased:
"Democrats voted in droves against their self interest".
That was very clearly the meaning behind your post.
This idea that Democrats followed leaders rather than decided on their own deserves dissection. If you wish, we can continue along those lines.
Too funny that @schuylaar is so dismissive of what I'm saying. It is a typical response from those who simply want to believe and have others believe what she does. Not that different from religion. This is why I call her kind -- cult of Sanders.
Bro, that is some extreme projection. Again, don't quote me saying things I've never said. This is a pretty basic request which I shouldn't even have to make. I never said anything remotely close to what you quoted me saying, and I don't even agree with that quote.Just look at your statement:
You are saying that Democrats acted as a group to a series of unrelated and unimportant events to cause a huge shift in the outlook of the race rather than because PEOPLE actually gave their votes some thought.
In context of your affiliation with the Bernie faction, who do in fact use the term "against their self interest" and "droves" to diminish people who didn't vote for Bernie , I paraphrased:
"Democrats voted in droves against their self interest".
That was very clearly the meaning behind your post.
This idea that Democrats followed leaders rather than decided on their own deserves dissection. If you wish, we can continue along those lines.
Too funny that @schuylaar is so dismissive of what I'm saying. It is a typical response from those who simply want to believe and have others believe what she does. Not that different from religion. This is why I call her kind -- cult of Sanders.
OK, then explain what you meant because I can break your statement down if you like. You just deny it, so, in different words, tell me what you were trying to say.Bro, that is some extreme projection. Again, don't quote me saying things I've never said. This is a pretty basic request which I shouldn't even have to make. I never said anything remotely close to what you quoted me saying, and I don't even agree with that quote.
I meant exactly what I said. Nothing more nothing less. It wasn't complicated.OK, then explain what you meant because I can break your statement down if you like. You just deny it, so, in different words, tell me what you were trying to say.
Then I'll stick with my clarification of your moused up sentences.I meant exactly what I said. Nothing more nothing less. It wasn't complicated.
I'm not interested in debating your personal interpretation of my statements, just don't quote me as saying something that I've never said and don't even agree with. I get it that you like to fight, but no reason to pick a fight when there's nothing to even fight over.Then I'll stick with my clarification of your moused up sentences.