I said "little to no Republicans", but nice try to again misrepresent my statement. 5% is very little and we don't know how that 5% was divided, so it could certainly be nothing, aka "little to no".
I didn't misrepresent your statement. I didn't even refer to your statement. I don't know why I should. In the article you posted, it says this:
Despite Trump’s urging, an exit poll from the Washington Post showed just 5 percent of registered Republicans actually voted in the primary, a number too small for pollsters to give details on which Democratic candidate received the most votes from that group.
What you claimed in your post is a distortion:
There was in reality little to no republican support in SC, despite Trump's efforts..
There are limits to what Trump can convince his Republican supporters to do.
www.vox.com
The phrase, "little to no", is, I suppose up to debate. What can definitely be said is that 5% of Republicans voted in the Democratic Primary with Trump's admonition to vote for Sanders in the background. Given their nearly uniform loyalty to their maximum leader, I simply don't believe that a Republican would vote for Biden in light of what Trump said and instead they voted for Sanders according to their leader's instructions. You may believe what you want. You don't even need to explain yourself, as I just did.
As it is, Biden walloped Sanders in that primary. So, if you want to continue to argue about nothing important, go for it.