potroastV2
Well-Known Member
Interesting hypothesis!
I'll give this some consideration, and submit it to the committee.
Notice: Trolls Keep Bumping Threads With Stupid Propagandist Titles
- Thread starter hanimmal
- Start date
Interesting hypothesis!
I'll give this some consideration, and submit it to the committee.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
zactly
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Not your place to judge buck. Let’s all give our political opinions respectfully and understand others may disagree. All good.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
You quoting the wrong post?
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
No sir.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
remember when you told a holocaust denier that you loved him?
Such a respectful member you are
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
As a trump lover, why do you feel you get to lecture anyone about being respectful
hillbill
Well-Known Member
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Sure I think healthcare should be a right, and technically everyone has access to it now, it will just bankrupt them if they don't have insurance coverage.
That is why I am in favor of expanding Obamacare to 100% of our population. Obama got us really close before the Republicans tried and failed to destroy it, but with some reasonable effort Biden and a Democratic House/Senate should be able to easily shore it up and get everyone covered.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Please elaborate.
Do you mean every person should have the right to access healthcare in the way they see fit?
Or do you mean every person should be mandated regarding healthcare as somebody else orders?
How is a ordering somebody to do something, related to protecting rights ?
Thanks in advance for your answer.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
You are welcome.
Everyone currently has access to free clinics and ER's. Unfortunately not 'as they see fit' because people are irrational and do things like take anti-biotic for viral infections, which is a complete waste.
I am not in favor of any government body forcing a person to get say a knee replacement. But do see the logic in mandating vaccines, just because the parent might be a nutter doesn't mean their kid should run around infecting everyone with Measles.
Because people around those people have rights too. People shouldn't be able to infect others because they don't believe in science. Just like someone who knows they have AIDS shouldn't be able to run around infecting random sexual partners without warning them prior. Some diseases are differently infectious and must be dealt with differently.
Kassiopeija
Well-Known Member
plus a highly contagious one, that will kill the ones with a bad immunsystem.
Kassiopeija
Well-Known Member
It's even two-fold harmful: (a) destroyes ones immunsystems so the viral infection will last longer (b) has a tendency to create anti-biotic resistant bacterias
that's why it's better to listen & stick to the advice of professionals - esp. if these are academics - and which get payed to know what's good for the people.
Some folks take a very specific case and generalize it broadly in order to illustrate something is being taken away from them. That's far from reality and not a valid way to make an argument at all.
+1
That parent does even a bad service to its own offspring by letting it contract measles in the first place, which could be prevented.
It could even become extinct if we would all cooperate & help the poor nations.
25% death rate [!] of infected in 3rd world poor nations:
Epidemiology and Transmission of Measles | PDF | Eradication Of Infectious Diseases | Measles
Scribd ist die weltweit größte soziale Plattform zum Lesen und Veröffentlichen.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
No worries man, I will, especially when people deflect from the continued attack on our citizens by the Russians that has been shown to have been continuing in 2020. Because we know Trump is trying to shield his cult from understanding that it is continuing across every forum online trying to create any social divisions that they can to hurt us.
And the bi-partisan senate report came out in 2018, it is still highly relevant and proof of what is going on to our country.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Given the new population of "Canadian" trolls we now have at RIU, perhaps revisiting the objective of this attack is in order, :
Exposing Russia’s Effort to Sow Discord Online: The Internet Research Agency and Advertisements
“[H]ad a strategic goal to sow discord in the U.S. political system, including the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Defendants posted derogatory information about a number of candidates, and by early to mid-2016, Defendants’ operations included supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump (“Trump Campaign”) and disparaging Hillary Clinton. Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities. Defendants also staged political rallies inside the United States, and while posing as U.S. grassroots entities and U.S. persons, and without revealing their Russian identities and ORGANIZATION affiliation, solicited and compensated real U.S. persons to promote or disparage candidates. Some Defendants, posing as U.S. persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign and with other political activists to seek to coordinate political activities.”
I look at the crap these so-called "Canadians" are posting and I see little news or current affairs. I see plenty of pleas to emotion that fit the "sow discord" objective very well. Also, right wing propaganda, such as their little bid to distract with the hydroxychloroquine hoax. We both know who jumped on that topic with both feet and feeds from some nobody 7th day Adventist-doctor.
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
Since you weren’t specific I can only assume you weren’t referring to me. These are the latest threads I started:Given the new population of "Canadian" trolls we now have at RIU, perhaps revisiting the objective of this attack is in order, :
Exposing Russia’s Effort to Sow Discord Online: The Internet Research Agency and Advertisements
“[H]ad a strategic goal to sow discord in the U.S. political system, including the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Defendants posted derogatory information about a number of candidates, and by early to mid-2016, Defendants’ operations included supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump (“Trump Campaign”) and disparaging Hillary Clinton. Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities. Defendants also staged political rallies inside the United States, and while posing as U.S. grassroots entities and U.S. persons, and without revealing their Russian identities and ORGANIZATION affiliation, solicited and compensated real U.S. persons to promote or disparage candidates. Some Defendants, posing as U.S. persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign and with other political activists to seek to coordinate political activities.”
I look at the crap these so-called "Canadians" are posting and I see little news or current affairs.
Did you read the letters by Professor Richardson? If you haven’t, you should.