correct and when you get that percentage because it's much higher you solve for X.You’re doing it wrong
you divide the deaths by the total number of resolves cases, not total cases
derp
correct and when you get that percentage because it's much higher you solve for X.You’re doing it wrong
you divide the deaths by the total number of resolves cases, not total cases
derp
It very much matters how you do it actuallyDoesn't matter which way you do it... Garbage in garbage out.
we did say 'no bro math'..only reality will work here.Common sense says to divide total deaths by total resolved cases
no one here is your bro
No, you just divide.correct and when you get that percentage because it's much higher you solve for X.
No it doesn't when the numbers you put in are wrong.It very much matters how you do it actually
correct. when you solve for X you will divide..the whole point of the exercise is that there are many infected that haven't been accounted for.No, you just divide.
is math this fucking tough for you guys?
Wow your a geniusCommon sense says to divide total deaths by total resolved cases
no one here is your bro
No it doesn't when the numbers you put in are wrong.
no wonder you claim your strains have 232% THC. jenius.Wow your a genius
Asimov has always been one of my faves. Not just his sci-fi but his non-fiction too. Stephen king is also a fave so much I actually paid retail for his last couple of books and both were worth every penny. Dr. Sleep, (sequel to The Shining), and The Institute.Yup, he and Whitman are also on my poetry list of must reads, and Edgar Allan Poe.
Do you like Asimov, he's on my list, alongside Steinbeck as being one of my favorite American authors
But it's a long list.
That’s a stupid assumption to make when it’s pretty clear when someone dies or doesntNo it doesn't when the numbers you put in are wrong.
Absolutelyno wonder you claim your strains have 232% THC. jenius.
No it just seems that way to you because you’re dumbWow your a genius
Finally some common sense. Thank you sirForget about calculating a death rate. It is not possible yet.
ONLY A FRACTION OF ACTUAL CASES GET COUNTED IN THE STATS! MOST PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SERIOUS SYMPTOMS AND WILL NOT SHOW UP IN THE CASE STATS. REAL NUMBER OF CASES IS MOST LIKELY 10-20 TIMES LARGER THAN THE STATS SHOW AND YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE COMPLETELY SKEWED. THEY HAVE ZERO RELEVANCE.
what are the benefits of ignoring known dataForget about calculating a death rate. It is not possible yet.
ONLY A FRACTION OF ACTUAL CASES GET COUNTED IN THE STATS! MOST PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SERIOUS SYMPTOMS AND WILL NOT SHOW UP IN THE CASE STATS. REAL NUMBER OF CASES IS MOST LIKELY 10-20 TIMES LARGER THAN THE STATS SHOW AND YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE COMPLETELY SKEWED. THEY HAVE ZERO RELEVANCE.
Common sense means extrapolating from what data we do have, not ignoring itFinally some common sense. Thank you sir