GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
You're embarrassing yourself.
NO defoliation appreciation thread.
- Thread starter GC_Mospeada
- Start date
- Status
Funny you say that, especially within this thread.
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
Kassiopeija gave a much better response.
Which was? You can't even cite what you're referring to? Sheesh... you're beyond the desperation stage, you're just stating names of people now that you *think* back you.
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
Haha so you can't even go back a few comments...Pathetic.
I can read. I don't have to look over what I've already read. What insult is next?
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
You're too absorbed in the spite that I have put in you.
Kassiopeija
Well-Known Member
and Silica - against mold.
Im testing out a new amendment in my soil- & cocomix - Diatomin. based on Diatomacious Earth, its structure is like Seramis, it stores a bit moisture but adds moistly to the airation of the medium.
Im testing out a new amendment in my soil- & cocomix - Diatomin. based on Diatomacious Earth, its structure is like Seramis, it stores a bit moisture but adds moistly to the airation of the medium.
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
Yeah I use silica too...how much ppm do you go? I just went with the minimum recommendation of 100 ppm. it actually makes up just less than a third of my nutrient base.
I'm actually absorbed in a significant mathematical issue for an engineering project I'm working on, whereby one of my manufacturers is pissing me off. For that reason, I have all the time in the world to bunt your silliness all over the place so that you're respected with the attention you deserve
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
That's something I'll speak openly about...My feed. I'm an under feeder. I take a ppm reading before I top the res and after
Really? Because if you were serious you'd be going back to address the main points. I've used academic based papers to base my arguments. Especially the things I state as FACT. That's how climate scientists came to the conclusion that climate change really was real. They didn't just walk out side and look at the weather for a few days and say yep...I know enough.I'm actually absorbed in a significant mathematical issue for an engineering project I'm working on, whereby one of my manufacturers is pissing me off. For that reason, I have all the time in the world to bunt your silliness all over the place so that you're respected with the attention you deserve
You've presented nothing. You're assuming I'm one of your pushover friends here.
I'm not even close to that.
Using climate to bolster your claims about your growing ability? Heh. I've seen that tactic before. It's called "deferring".
bk78
Well-Known Member
Weird... on that stupid little feed chart you posted silica wasn’t part of it and I believe it was only a total of 350ppm for the full nutrient mix?
Love it when people like you start to slip on their own shit.
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
So you cant read you mean?
bk78
Well-Known Member
The chart you posted had a total of 350ppm. FOH
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
You cant read dates?
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
Also I said it was the calibration week when I first posted it moron.
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
You guys should learn to read...also thinking would help. Before commenting.
It's a spreadsheet created with the experience of a year one office assistant position.
Expert knowledge based on expert records from an expert grower LOL
GC_Mospeada
Well-Known Member
Okay so how the spread sheet looks is more important that the data that is in it...You probably think you can judge how much thc a plant has by looking at it. Actually that's a bad example...You probably think that how the plant LOOKS is actually the most important thing...because you're superficial.
- Status