tut, tut,It's the best and only option we have thanks to Trump's incompetence.
That doesn't mean they work, just sayin...It's the best and only option we have thanks to Trump's incompetence.
you haven't proven they don't work in my estimation. comparing south korea to our response is nonsense.That doesn't mean they work, just sayin.
yep, 30000 tests for 6 million people!unless you have 'western spirit' and don't know anyone who's sick so therefore it's a hoax and fake news.
you do live in ColoraDUH right?
I didn't just compare it though. I spewed a bunch of science stuff and wrote long ass posts that were boring which nobody will ever read.you haven't proven they don't work in my estimation. comparing south korea to our response is nonsense.
See Sweden for that. Anyway, that's not exactly the point, it's a question that misunderstands my argument. Which is fine, you can disagree, but you're showing me you didn't get what I meant.if NYC was not under lockdown, how many cases would they have?
Here is the argument, made as short as I can make it.if NYC was not under lockdown, how many cases would they have?
You think you know but there's more than that, friend also, Wyoming doesn't want theirs..it's a hoax.yep, 30000 tests for 6 million people!
you also said the lockdowns should be lifted since they are ineffective and get the economy going again.I'm saying that's not possible
Pardon?You think you know but there's more than that, friend
i've been to both places: population density is not even remotely similar. Malmo, one of the bigger cities has a density more like Poughkeepsie, not Manhattan.See Sweden for that
It's not only possible but the signals all show lockdowns work.Here is the argument, made as short as I can make it.
Lockdown strategy means "flatten the curve". So I will assume you read my thing about the numbers in NY and understand it. What that means is that our healthcare system has to absorb that impact and pray to Jeebus that there's not another new york like case or even two or three such outbreak cities in the US.
We have to keep the apex of that curve below the baseline of our healthcare capacity, all the way until there's a vaccine.
I'm saying that's not possible.
would have been 5x's that without a lockdown....7,636 additional New Yorkers clearly broke the law by breaching the lockdown and getting themselves infected.
Some curve ya got there...
Michigan has drive-through testing and a small army of contact tracers. So it's much more than just a lockdown. That's the problem with politicized articles. I despise Trump and his acolytes too, but to take a John's Hopkins study and say that it's aligned with the political point against caravaners made by WaPo is just as dishonest as the shit you hate.It's not only possible but the signals all show lockdowns work.
For example:
View attachment 4535718
People aren't going to be able to freely mingle until its safe to do so.
You aren't alone in your impatience for this to be over. A bunch of people in Michigan agree. They are wrong but they have the right to be wrong.
Hey I'm no scientist and neither are you. The scientist all say lockdowns save lives.Citation required. You're making a definite claim regarding numbers, I want proof.