hanimmal
Well-Known Member
That is the problem, it is too easy for people to get guns and too hard to get them out of circulation when people don't want them getting into the hands of irresponsible people's hands.They are liable if a gun fails and causes injury. If it does what is designed to do then the onus is on the bearer. If I drive a car into you and kill you should the car manufacturer be liable?
If you look at the gun crimes, most of the guns used were purchased legally.
I played with guns throughout my childhood too.
If a product ends up hurting or killing someone, like Macdonalds coffee burns, or talcum powder cancer, gun manufacturers should have the same liability if they have an impact on someone's life. If nothing else they are manufacturers selling their product to vendors that they should have trust to distribute their product responsibly. And if they mess up and don't, they should be held accountable.
They should take better care to not make them
My lefty definition would be anything that is not really in hunting or a handgun. Sure if someone has giant packs of wild hogs attacking their farms, let them have all the human killing machines they need. But other than fun, there is no real reason for one of these guns. If anyone is coming at you where you need that kind of firepower, you're fucked anyways.Whats an "assault rifle"?