CSI humboldt thread

JewelRunner

Well-Known Member
Ran rados tk91, no nanners. Mud dog outside, no nanners. They were freebies too, right? Lol not everyone gets nanners on the 91's, but some do.
Pretty sure his 91 s1 selection out of 150 seeds throws nanas too. Bud on the lower left looks like it has one coming right out of the crown. Also see potential banana below that on the left as well as on the main cola. The pic isn’t super high def but you can see the little yellow areas.D4488A99-9BA2-4711-8B64-B97857EB3EB8.jpeg
 

Burton79

Well-Known Member
Pretty sure his 91 s1 selection out of 150 seeds throws nanas too. Bud on the lower left looks like it has one coming right out of the crown. Also see potential banana below that on the left as well as on the main cola. The pic isn’t super high def but you can see the little yellow areas.View attachment 4658931
I've seen Caleb get comments about nanners on IG, and he replied that late-stage nanners are no big deal.
 

JewelRunner

Well-Known Member
I've seen Caleb get comments about nanners on IG, and he replied that late-stage nanners are no big deal.
Meh. I dont love seeing them. I kind of think since all the chems came out of the same herm batch you’re really exacerbating the herm tendencies in any of the chem on chem reversals. They’re already bottlenecked, the chem 91 s1 is probably actually s2 and I’m assuming that’s why it’s so unstable. All just observation running 15 various chem cross plants from csi. Really no issues with the og x chem cross. Some good stuff out of those seeds
 

Gemtree

Well-Known Member
Meh. I dont love seeing them. I kind of think since all the chems came out of the same herm batch you’re really exacerbating the herm tendencies in any of the chem on chem reversals. They’re already bottlenecked, the chem 91 s1 is probably actually s2 and I’m assuming that’s why it’s so unstable. All just observation running 15 various chem cross plants from csi. Really no issues with the og x chem cross. Some good stuff out of those seeds
You try big bad wolf yet? That and the 91 s1 are the only 91 crosses I got
 

skuba

Well-Known Member
The ghost og x 91(rip) are nice and nana free, every single plant outta 7 seeds. I’ve seen some nice looking pics out of the 91s1, but my experience was pretty much nanas on every plant to varying degrees. I’ll see if the mud dog I just put out throw nanas or not... I know outdoors things are supposed to be more stable in general. Not really a fan of the 91 s1 or mud dog structure, but the last mud dog I pulled threw some chongers. Too afghani and not enough stretch. Also don’t love how the chems eat the F outta themselves end of flower. Again, I really need to get ahold of some clone only 91, 4, or d to smoke. But the chem notes were muted on the 91 s1, not bad on the mud dog. I’ve heard shop rag and shoe polish and that’s accurate but not terps I’m really in love with. The rip is more of a gas/super glue fume smell with an earthy background. Much prefer those kind of gassy fuely terps.
What I like about chemdog the most is the effect. Don’t get me wrong, I love the smell, but that could be because my brain knows I’m about to be not just stoned, but HIGH!
 

dopefest

Well-Known Member
Anyone else getting runts out of the obama x crosses? obama x zkittlez and obama x gsc as well as a runt in the obama s1's (founding). Just curious...a buddy of mine had a great run with the zkittlez cross, so maybe it's just my setup.

edit: wrong breeder referenced
 
Last edited:

Burton79

Well-Known Member
have a pack. Bakersfield's looked fire so I do have high hopes for that pack. haven't messed with the D yet and alotta people say that's where it's at
I have a big bad wolf that just started 12/12. Will report back in a couple months. I had a pack of CSI chem 91s that I couldn't get out of the seedling stage (runts). Prob my fault, but I gave up on them and went with big bad wolf. I also have the csi chemd x gsc and it is probably the best smelling and most vigorous plant I have grown so far.
 

hicountry1

Well-Known Member
The ghost og x 91(rip) are nice and nana free, every single plant outta 7 seeds. I’ve seen some nice looking pics out of the 91s1, but my experience was pretty much nanas on every plant to varying degrees. I’ll see if the mud dog I just put out throw nanas or not... I know outdoors things are supposed to be more stable in general. Not really a fan of the 91 s1 or mud dog structure, but the last mud dog I pulled threw some chongers. Too afghani and not enough stretch. Also don’t love how the chems eat the F outta themselves end of flower. Again, I really need to get ahold of some clone only 91, 4, or d to smoke. But the chem notes were muted on the 91 s1, not bad on the mud dog. I’ve heard shop rag and shoe polish and that’s accurate but not terps I’m really in love with. The rip is more of a gas/super glue fume smell with an earthy background. Much prefer those kind of gassy fuely terps.
Keep your eye on the RIP's his Ghost OG crosses, Spooky specifically for me threw nanners on the OG leaners that i didnt find until harvest. They were very well hidden at the bases of flowers. That being said everything I've ran from him has had nanners at some point on at least one pheno. All the chem 91 stuff I ran had them really bad.
 

bodhipop

Well-Known Member
I've never written anything in the comment box and always gotten the discount... sometimes even more than I was expecting ($10-20 )
Can anyone tell me how soon they hear back from Glo after payment? Do they send a tracking number? I haven't gotten a response in 2 days after paying for some CSI : /
 
Last edited:
Top