DCcan
Well-Known Member
Stolen from Best Western vs the originalDid I miss a painting?
Best of Velvet
Stolen from Best Western vs the originalDid I miss a painting?
Best of Velvet
Your point that tastes vary is legitimate. That said, I have two bones to pick with this.Art is art. This is not titled "Naturally Beautiful"
I like some of them.
Now there is a portrait that would not be improved by black light or black velvet.Stolen from Best Western vs the original
You can still suck at photoshop.......it's not one click and it's beautiful.Your point that tastes vary is legitimate. That said, I have two bones to pick with this.
The first is elevating Photoshop flummery to the level of a painting, which requires much more ability and work to execute. Hitting Print is imo a disqualifying element and a bit of an insult to those who have acquired skill with a brush.
The second is entirely subjective: I am unattracted to the style.
I can’t do photoshop. I don’t say well-processed photo files aren’t art. But they are not paintings.You can still suck at photoshop.......it's not one click and it's beautiful.
Look what they did to Monet...Harder to tell with a MatisseHitting Print is imo a disqualifying element and a bit of an insult to those who have acquired skill with a brush.
But Monet couldn't color in the lines......is it not art?Are we stoned yet?
Look what they did to Monet...Harder to tell with a Matisse
All in the eye..... sometimes only good shot has lots of sun glare.....you can clean that up and it looks great. How about some nuts.....you can make a tuck look "better"I can’t do photoshop. I don’t say well-processed photo files aren’t art. But they are not paintings.
Dégas and pastels...barf. Right up there with Gothic drama art.Stoned enough to rail against Dégas. Manet and Matisse were at least good draftsmen.
Sadly the art of Photography requires skills and discipline in getting it right the first time.Your point that tastes vary is legitimate. That said, I have two bones to pick with this.
The first is elevating Photoshop flummery to the level of a painting, which requires much more ability and work to execute. Hitting Print is imo a disqualifying element and a bit of an insult to those who have acquired skill with a brush.
The second is entirely subjective: I am unattracted to the style.
My ex has an exceptional eye. One of her b&w prints won first place at her college.Sadly the art of Photography requires skills and discipline in getting it right the first time.
PhotoShop is a coloring book, just stay in the lines.
No it's not like that.Sadly the art of Photography requires skills and discipline in getting it right the first time.
PhotoShop is a coloring book, just stay in the lines.
More like CRISPR DNA editing, anything is possible.No it's not like that.
I shoot in RAW format what do you wish to edit?No it's not like that.
That looks similar to the forbidden fruit I had. Some seriously tasty stuff.