What has Trump done to this country?

topcat

Well-Known Member
Glad you found this site then! And have a good day at work, stay safe.

The stuff you said above is exactly why I recommend AP news to check anything you care about. They don't screw around and just report the known facts. And it is free, so there is no 'pay wall' on actual fact checked, legally bound to be truthful, information.

I would question where you have seen 'both sides acting like children'. Because it is way to easy to have some talking head on the radio (who is essentially a left-troll push a idiotic narrative), along with some slickly edited clips of some Democrat politician that is out of context, to paint 'the left' as whatever the hate-radio personality wants to paint them as.

Couple that with trolls online pretending to be 'left' attacking you while the 'right troll' points to actual flaws in what their other account is spewing, and the bubble is complete making 'the left' look like fools.


I don't know man, it is about the time people might start to tune into the elections in a normal year. It would be very easy to stay in a bubble with how hard it is to talk to one another about anything since 2014.
Hats off to you, sir! You have much more patience than I. I won't even speak to my sister, though I do send her notes that I'm still alive. Repulsive beings, those Trump supporters.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
i gave them a pass in 2016 as Hillary wasn't exactly a stellar candidate either IMO. but knowing what we know now, trump supporters are stupid and racist, plain and simple
Or scared into believing the racist propaganda Trump's troll army is spamming them while pretending to be their friends online while spamming them nonstop with stupid 'leftist' shit.

How hard would it really be to make 200 million or so spam bots to follow individuals around the internet?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Or scared into believing the racist propaganda Trump's troll army is spamming them while pretending to be their friends online while spamming them nonstop with stupid 'leftist' shit.

How hard would it really be to make 200 million or so spam bots to follow individuals around the internet?
it would be easier to not buy the $5 box of cookies.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
That would apply to everyone in my family other than one of my brothers and 2 cousins........I have 24 cousins.
None of which are able to recognize their own bigotry and racism.
You almost have a large enough 'n' to do some fun statistical analysis with.

Starting with how many of them are on social media, and if so how many websites to they frequent (which ones).

So for me, this website is the only one I use for 'social media' other than a few comments here and there on the washington post comments.

Then websites I frequent are the AP news (free source journalism), Washington Post (paid content), cable TV mostly MSNBC, CSPAN for hearings/sunday morning, and all the major Sunday morning political news shows.

And I know 0% of the people I socialize with online in real life. I would be curious how much of a percent of content people see on a daily basis from 'people' they have never met before.

God, now I am thinking of a questionnaire on how radicalized they are and how the math would work to tease out how radicalized they are as a percentage of how many people they actually know.
 

0vergrown420

Well-Known Member
Apparently morals mean nothing to you.
Anybody that can't see the difference between the two candidates isn't a real person with real feelings.
Yes morals mean a lot to me. I can only speak on the things that I have seen and heard. I live in a primarily republican area so I'm sure all of my feeds and the radio are biased. I just want the big picture before I cast any vote.
 

mysunnyboy

Well-Known Member

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Yes morals mean a lot to me. I can only speak on the things that I have seen and heard. I live in a primarily republican area so I'm sure all of my feeds and the radio are biased. I just want the big picture before I cast any vote.
Local news scam 'local' websites that are propaganda is something that is reality too.

It is very likely you also are one of the 'Sinclair broadcasting' type local television news too, which makes it hard to get complete information because it gets cherry picked to the point people can't see how the conclusions the talking heads make are bogus unless they spend way too much time understanding where they are basing their conclusions on false premises.


This scam from the Wealthy White Heterosexual Male Only agenda to paint anything the Democrats do as radical and some kind of '-ism', goes back a long ways.
 
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I don't actually know. It might just be that I watched too many of the propaganda videos and that brandname of the spray stuck with me. I might just be associated it with sprays that are not mace (because mace is in tiny bottles that people can easily put in a purse or pocket) while the propaganda protest videos I have looked at show people with large spray bottles.

Vice is a good one to show all the branding on these protests.
View attachment 4714735
can someone explain the new sensation of bear spray..is it pee?..is it mace? WTF?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ahhhhhhh it's becoming much clearer to me now..those with felonies are ineligible:

Persons are ineligible to own or possess pepper spray (Penal Code § 12403.7).
:
(a) No person convicted of a felony or any crime involving an assault under the laws of the United States, the State of California, or any other state, government, or country or convicted of misuse of tear gas under subdivision (g) shall purchase, possess, or use tear gas or tear gas weapons.

(b) No person who is addicted to any narcotic drug shall purchase, possess, or use tear gas or tear gas weapons.

(c) No person shall sell or furnish any tear gas or tear gas weapon to a minor.

(d) No person who is a minor shall purchase, possess, or use tear gas or tear gas weapons.

(e) (1) No person shall purchase, possess, or use any tear gas weapon that expels a projectile, or that expels the tear gas by any method other than an aerosol spray, or that contains more than 2.5 ounces net weight of aerosol spray."
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You almost have a large enough 'n' to do some fun statistical analysis with.

Starting with how many of them are on social media, and if so how many websites to they frequent (which ones).

So for me, this website is the only one I use for 'social media' other than a few comments here and there on the washington post comments.

Then websites I frequent are the AP news (free source journalism), Washington Post (paid content), cable TV mostly MSNBC, CSPAN for hearings/sunday morning, and all the major Sunday morning political news shows.

And I know 0% of the people I socialize with online in real life. I would be curious how much of a percent of content people see on a daily basis from 'people' they have never met before.

God, now I am thinking of a questionnaire on how radicalized they are and how the math would work to tease out how radicalized they are as a percentage of how many people they actually know.


data sets anyone?:lol:
 

0vergrown420

Well-Known Member
a smart businessman would never bankrupt casinos where the House always wins
I'm figuring out that there are a great many ppl that know a lot more about the political situation than I. It wasn't till a few months ago that I have been LOOKING at democrats side instead of just putting stock in what I hear. I cant help how biased the sources are in my area. Hence why I'm now partaking in this thread.
 
Top