Charles Koch decries his (and his dead brother's)own participation in dividing America: "Boy, did we screw up"

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Business Insider: Charles Koch says he regrets fueling partisanship: 'Boy, did we screw up!' - Business Insider.
and if it worked? what would he be saying then? these cretins are such POSs..like i'm going ot believe any shit he says.

those are just legacy comments- there! he said it! try to save face at all costs! but it didn't stop a very smart man from thinking like one with an IQ of 78.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member

haloman420

Well-Known Member

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Tell ya what Charles, buy a cruse ship (they are cheap now) and invite the entire WH for a million dollar give away to each guest after they are out of office. When the ship gets to the middle of the ocean the crew does a lifeboat drill and when they get far enough away, the ten tons of HE in the engine room goes off...

Same thing for the GOP congressional cruse that will be happen at the same time.

That will do for a start Charlie..
 

Bagginski

Well-Known Member
One of the modern-era GOP tactical favorites has been to project onto some target ‘liberal’ the things they themselves have been up to in secret...case in point: Charles Koch.

As discovered and reported by historian and researcher Nancy McLean, Koch has been organizing and funding a covert effort to eliminate the voice of the people from US politics, with the intent of remaking the USA into a new-feudal state in which the wealthy alone call all the shots and control polices foreign and domestic. In service to this, he has bought outright - or controlling interest in - the libertarian party, Reason Magazine, the Heritage Foundation, “Americans for Prosperity”, the Tea Party, the economics departments of colleges and universities all over the US, and the GOP. Among his ‘accomplishments’ is the military coup in Chile during the ‘70s and the reign of terror and murder that followed it - capped off by the imposition of a new constitution which removed the public from having any influence over what happened to them, reserving that power for the wealthy and well-connected; said constitution was written and directed by Koch’s partner in crime, economist James Buchanan. Said constitution was a dry run for what they planned for the USA.

Such a massive and expensive effort couldn’t be hidden entirely, so George Soros was set up as the patsy; and the fears of right-minded and alarmed, but dull-witted, “conservative patriots” over the massive shifts in the US they could *almost* were aimed aggressively at Soros, so *he* could catch the flak while the systemic subversion of government at all levels could continue without serious attention being drawn.

For the doubtful and/or paranoid, I recommend the following links (which some of you will have already seen):



EPILOGUE: it only in recent months that Chile has managed to rid itself of that feudal constitution they were saddled with...it only took 50 years. In the US, with an entire political and economic support structure secretly in the bag for such a thing, and voter suppression at a peak as it is, it could have taken us a full century to claw our way out from under such a thing....
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
One of the modern-era GOP tactical favorites has been to project onto some target ‘liberal’ the things they themselves have been up to in secret...case in point: Charles Koch.

As discovered and reported by historian and researcher Nancy McLean, Koch has been organizing and funding a covert effort to eliminate the voice of the people from US politics, with the intent of remaking the USA into a new-feudal state in which the wealthy alone call all the shots and control polices foreign and domestic. In service to this, he has bought outright - or controlling interest in - the libertarian party, Reason Magazine, the Heritage Foundation, “Americans for Prosperity”, the Tea Party, the economics departments of colleges and universities all over the US, and the GOP. Among his ‘accomplishments’ is the military coup in Chile during the70s and the reign of terror and murder that followed it - capped off by the imposition of a new constitution which removed the public from having any influence over what happened to them, reserving that power for the wealthy and well-connected; said constitution was written and directed by Koch’s partner in crime, economist James Buchanan. Said constitution was a dry run for what they planned for the USA.

Such a massive and expensive effort couldn’t be hidden entirely, so George Soros was set up as the patsy; and the fears of right-minded and alarmed, but dull-witted, “conservative patriots” over the massive shifts in the US they could *almost* were aimed aggressively at Soros, so *he* could catch the flak while the systemic subversion of government at all levels could continue without serious attention being drawn.

For the doubtful and/or paranoid, I recommend the following links (which some of you will have already seen):


That's why if there is a Hell, Charlie will end up on the Devil's doorstep like his brother.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

By numbers: how the US voted in 2020
A preliminary snapshot suggests the wealthy stood by Trump but the more highly educated backed Biden


Joe Biden won the US presidential race after Donald Trump lost support among the white voters who carried him to success in 2016, while Americans have become more divided by place and income.

Mr Trump gained ground among the wealthy, while the more educated broke more strongly for the Democrats than in 2016, an early analysis of data from national exit polls and other post-election and election eve surveys shows.

This data is only a preliminary snapshot and comes with some health warnings. Exit polls will be reweighted to reflect final vote tallies, which have been slower to come in this year due to the pandemic. The way exit polls are conducted has changed since 2016, complicating historical comparisons.

Finally, the unprecedented surge in early and mail-in voting may affect the data that has been collected. In order to correct for these issues, the Financial Times has supplemented exit polls with other data sources to confirm trends.

Here are some of the trends the data suggest so far about how Americans voted:

1. Trump lost ground with white voters
In 2016, Mr Trump’s victory largely hinged on the enthusiasm of white voters without a college degree.

This year, Mr Trump did about as well among this group (63 per cent supported him in both years), but Mr Biden made gains (36 per cent compared to 32 per cent for Hillary Clinton in 2016). The result is a 4-point Democratic swing among non-college educated whites.
more...
 
Top