MICHI-CAN
Well-Known Member
I only touch a cup to pass. LOL.rule #1 in hockey: the only time you touch the Cup is if you win the Cup.
I only touch a cup to pass. LOL.rule #1 in hockey: the only time you touch the Cup is if you win the Cup.
Oh, Hi.Bro, there’s almost nothing but hard left cultists in the political section. You won’t get honest answers from any of them, and 99% have no posts outside the political subsection of a goddamn weed forum.
That's correct. The PROPOSED Keystone XL ends in Nebraska. The already existing lines would take it from there. It's not even complete to that point yet and is not capable of getting oil anywhere near Nebraska junction lines yet.
I think they should drill a tunnel through the mountains and ship it from one of their Western ports.that is by far the most direct route: sludge, refine on west coast of CA, ship to china.
we're getting Deb Haaland now for Interior..long overdue i'm extremely excited.Sadly no. We've seen some good improvements on these issue under the Liberal government these last 5 years but still have something like 80+ first nations communities that struggle with clean water today. Internet in the north is very sketchy and low speed still. People are excited about Starlink cause it's better than the traditional/old infrastructure up there.
sure right through Greater Idaho..i can see it now..would you have to give up land for the cause?I think they should drill a tunnel through the mountains and ship it from one of their Western ports.
It should be in Canadian territory.sure right through Greater Idaho..i can see it now..would you have to give up land for the cause?
Well, there's already pipelines going that way, and they're expanding them as we speak as well. The goal for these companies is to export as much as they possibly can, however they. Which direction the pipelines run is almost immaterial to them as long as they can increase their production levels and export numbers.I think they should drill a tunnel through the mountains and ship it from one of their Western ports.
we have unused nukes to help drill that tunnel.Well, there's already pipelines going that way, and they're expanding them as we speak as well. The goal for these companies is to export as much as they possibly can, however they. Which direction the pipelines run is almost immaterial to them as long as they can increase their production levels and export numbers.
succinct but exactly my point.It should be in Canadian territory.
The solid line is the existing one. If they would have followed it the pipeline would have been built already. But they wanted to save on construction and pumping costs. It makes sense if there was no opposition.That's correct. The PROPOSED Keystone XL ends in Nebraska. The already existing lines would take it from there. It's not even complete to that point yet and is not capable of getting oil anywhere near Nebraska junction lines yet.
Make the tunnel for traffic also. Driving over the mountains is pretty but it would be nice to cut some time off the trip.I think they should drill a tunnel through the mountains and ship it from one of their Western ports.
New pipelines are good for years, it is only when they get old. By the time the Keystone line would get aged, we will all be flying electric cars.succinct but exactly my point.
if anything, we should be inspecting/retrofitting/improving/etc all of our aging pipelines here. they are gonna leak, i think that's a given, and we should improve on shut down response time and containment.
I'll pass this on to the architect.Make the tunnel for traffic also. Driving over the mountains is pretty but it would be nice to cut some time off the trip.
and you guys haven't won a Stanley cup in 3 decades!!!! lol. just kidding: i know that's below the belt. lol.